Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Denise Draper

dblp:41/6550 · also Denise L. Draper · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
6as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 4 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers
Data integration and cleaning · 83% Database system architecture and tuning · 17%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data integration and cleaning › semi-structured data integration
XML data integration
0.122001
The Nimble Integration Engine · SIGMOD Conference 2001
The Nimble XML Data Integration System · ICDE 2001
Data integration and cleaning
enterprise information integration
0.112005
Enterprise information integration: successes, challenges and controversies · SIGMOD Conference 2005
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
scheduling
0.011999
Cyclic Scheduling · IJCAI 1999
Data integration and cleaning
data warehouse
0.012005
Enterprise information integration: successes, challenges and controversies · SIGMOD Conference 2005
Data integration and cleaning › data integration system
virtual data integration
0.012005
Enterprise information integration: successes, challenges and controversies · SIGMOD Conference 2005
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty
planning under incomplete information
0.011992
An Approach to Planning with Incomplete Information · KR 1992
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
planning under uncertainty
0.011992
An Approach to Planning with Incomplete Information · KR 1992

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

on-the-fly data cleaning · 0.0caching and materialization · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2005 Enterprise information integration: successes, challenges and controversies
abstract
The goal of EII systems is to provide uniform access to multiple data sources without having to first load them into a data warehouse. Since the late 1990's, several EII products have appeared in the marketplace and significant experience has been accumulated from fielding such systems. This collection of articles, by individuals who were involved in this industry in various ways, describes some of these experiences and points to the challenges ahead.
Alon Y. Halevy, Naveen Ashish, Dina Bitton, Michael J. Carey 0001, Denise Draper, Jeff Pollock, Arnon Rosenthal, Vishal Sikka
SIGMOD Conference5
2001 The Nimble XML Data Integration System
abstract
For better or for worse, XML has emerged as a de facto standard for data interchange. This consensus is likely to lead to increased demand for technology that allows users to integrate data from a variety of applications, repositories, and partners, which are located across the corporate intranet or on the Internet. Nimble Technology has spent two years developing a product to service this market. Originally conceived after decades of person-years of research on data integration, the product is now being deployed at several Fortune-500 beta-customer sites. The article reports on the key challenges faced in the design of our product and highlights some issues which require more attention from the research community. In particular we address architectural issues arising from designing a product to support XML as its core representation, choices in the design of the underlying algebra, on-the-fly data cleaning and caching and materialization policies.
Denise Draper, Alon Y. Halevy, Daniel S. Weld
ICDE1
2001 The Nimble Integration Engine
abstract
The consensus that XML has become the de facto standard for data interchange will spur demand for technology that allows users to integrate data from a variety of applications, repositories, and legacy systems which are located across the corporate intranet or at partner companies on the Internet. In the past two years, Nimble Technology has developed a product for this market. Spawned from over a persondecade of data integration research, the product has been deployed at several Fortune-500 beta-customer sites. This abstract reports on the key challenges we faced in the design of our product and highlights some issues we think require more attention from the research community. 1.
Denise Draper, Alon Y. Halevy, Daniel S. Weld
SIGMOD Conference1
1999 Cyclic Scheduling
Denise Draper, Ari K. Jónsson, Dave Clements, David Joslin 0002
IJCAI1
1995 Clustering Without (Thinking About) Triangulation
Denise Draper
UAI1
1994 Localized Partial Evaluation of Belief Networks
Denise Draper, Steve Hanks
UAI1
1994 A Probablistic Model of Action for Least-Commitment Planning with Information Gathering
Denise Draper, Steve Hanks, Daniel S. Weld
UAI1
1992 An Approach to Planning with Incomplete Information
Oren Etzioni, Steve Hanks, Daniel S. Weld, Denise Draper, Neal Lesh, Mike Williamson
KR4