Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Hamilton A. Turner
dblp:41/7640
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
0000-0001-6475-5881ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 4 · 1 first-authorComputer networks · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Parallel and multicore computing · 77% Embedded and real-time systems · 23% | |
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Physical-layer communications · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Physical-layer communications
software-defined radio |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Software Frameworks for SDR · Proc. IEEE 2015 |
Embedded and real-time systems
real-time signal processing |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Software Frameworks for SDR · Proc. IEEE 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
distributed deployment · 0.4software frameworks · 0.2software framework · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Automated QoS-oriented cloud resource optimization using containers
Yu Sun 0002, Jules White, Bo Li 0026, Michael Walker 0003, Hamilton A. Turner |
Autom. Softw. Eng. | 5 |
| 2016 | Testing variability-intensive systems using automated analysis: an application to Android
José A. Galindo, Hamilton A. Turner, David Benavides 0001, Jules White |
Softw. Qual. J. | 2 |
| 2015 | Software Frameworks for SDRabstractThis paper describes the state of the art in software frameworks for executing Software Defined Radio (SDR) components. These frameworks are catalyzing drastic changes in signal processing by enabling software engineers and signal processing engineers to work in tandem on core challenges, such as effectively processing large amounts of data in real-time on limited hardware resources. In addition to a historical perspective of this area, we showcase the REDHAWK framework as an example of a modern SDR framework which provides many facilities for distributed SDR deployment. Max Robert, Yu Sun 0002, Thomas Goodwin, Hamilton A. Turner, Jeffrey H. Reed, Jules White |
Proc. IEEE | 4 |
| 2014 | DRE system performance optimization with the SMACK cache efficiency metric
Hamilton A. Turner, Brian Dougherty, Jules White, Russell Kegley, Jonathan Preston, Douglas C. Schmidt, Aniruddha S. Gokhale |
J. Syst. Softw. | 1 |
| 2013 | Applying machine learning classifiers to dynamic Android malware detection at scaleabstractThe widespread adoption and contextually sensitive nature of smartphone devices has increased concerns over smartphone malware. Machine learning classifiers are a current method for detecting malicious applications on smartphone systems. This paper presents the evaluation of a number of existing classifiers, using a dataset containing thousands of real (i.e. not synthetic) applications. We also present our STREAM framework, which was developed to enable rapid large-scale validation of mobile malware machine learning classifiers. Brandon Amos, Hamilton A. Turner, Jules White |
IWCMC | 2 |
| 2011 | WreckWatch: Automatic Traffic Accident Detection and Notification with Smartphones
Jules White, Hamilton A. Turner, Brian Dougherty, Douglas C. Schmidt |
Mob. Networks Appl. | 3 |
| 2009 | Unit Testing Non-functional Concerns of Component-based Distributed SystemsabstractUnit testing component-based distributed systems traditionally involves testing functional concerns of the application logic throughout the software lifecycle. In contrast, testing non-functional distributed system concerns (e.g., end-to-end response time, security, and reliability) typically does not occur until system integration because it requires a complete system to perform such tests, as well as sophisticated techniques to identify and analyze performance metrics that constitute non-functional concerns. Unit testing non-functional concerns is even harder in an agile development environment, due to the disconnect between high-level system specification and low-level performance metrics. This paper describes a methodology and tool called Understanding Non-functional Intentions via Testing and Experimentation (UNITE). UNITE is designed to unit test non-functional concerns of three component-based distributed systems. The results from applying UNITE to a component-based distributed system show how it simplifies unit testing and evaluation of non-functional properties during the early stages of the software lifecycle. James H. Hill, Hamilton A. Turner, James R. Edmondson, Douglas C. Schmidt |
ICST | 2 |