Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lily Saada

dblp:410/2445 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0003-8590-6740ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Automata and formal languages · 50% Automated reasoning and model checking · 50%
Computer networks
1 paper
Network management and operations · 77% Software-defined and programmable networks · 23%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Network management and operations
network verification
0.912025
StacKAT: Infinite State Network Verification · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025
Automated reasoning and model checking
decision procedures
0.912025
StacKAT: Infinite State Network Verification · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025
Automata and formal languages
finite automata
0.912025
StacKAT: Infinite State Network Verification · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025
Software-defined and programmable networks › network programming
network programming languages
0.312025
StacKAT: Infinite State Network Verification · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

kleene algebra with tests · 1.7automata theory · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 StacKAT: Infinite State Network Verification
abstract
We develop StacKAT, a network verification language featuring loops, finite state variables, nondeterminism, and—most importantly—access to a stack with accompanying push and pop operations. By viewing the variables and stack as the (parsed) headers and (to-be-parsed) contents of a network packet, StacKAT can express a wide range of network behaviors including parsing, source routing, and telemetry. These behaviors are difficult or impossible to model using existing languages like NetKAT . We develop a decision procedure for StacKAT program equivalence, based on finite automata. This decision procedure provides the theoretical basis for verifying network-wide properties and is able to provide counterexamples for inequivalent programs. Finally, we provide an axiomatization of StacKAT equivalence and establish its completeness.
Jules Jacobs, Nate Foster, Tobias Kappé, Dexter Kozen, Lily Saada, Alexandra Silva 0001, Jana Wagemaker
Proc. ACM Program. Lang.5