Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Raphaël Raux
dblp:410/3496
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0005-7425-0138ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Human-AI interaction · 100% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational social science and digital humanities › socio-technical systems
technology adoption |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Human Learning about AI · EC 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
survey · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Human Learning about AIabstractBeliefs about the performance of new technologies strongly condition their usage. Among new technologies, artificial intelligence (AI)—and in particular LLMs—stand out because they can be used for extremely diverse sets of tasks. This versatility, however, complicates the problem of learning about AI capabilities, especially since the technological frontier created by AI is often "jagged": among seemingly similar tasks, AI can vastly out-perform humans on some, yet under-perform on others. Inaccurate perceptions of performance could lead to productivity losses, if AI is used for tasks on which it performs poorly. Raphaël Raux, Bnaya Dreyfuss |
EC | 1 |