Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Raphaël Raux

dblp:410/3496 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0005-7425-0138ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-AI interaction · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational social science and digital humanities › socio-technical systems
technology adoption
0.912025
Human Learning about AI · EC 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

survey · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Human Learning about AI
abstract
Beliefs about the performance of new technologies strongly condition their usage. Among new technologies, artificial intelligence (AI)—and in particular LLMs—stand out because they can be used for extremely diverse sets of tasks. This versatility, however, complicates the problem of learning about AI capabilities, especially since the technological frontier created by AI is often "jagged": among seemingly similar tasks, AI can vastly out-perform humans on some, yet under-perform on others. Inaccurate perceptions of performance could lead to productivity losses, if AI is used for tasks on which it performs poorly.
Raphaël Raux, Bnaya Dreyfuss
EC1