EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Bofang Jiang
dblp:410/3975
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational science and engineering · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational science and engineering › partial differential equations
partial differential equation discovery |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | PhysPDE: Rethinking PDE Discovery and a Physical Hypothesis Selection Benchmark · ICLR 2025 |
Computational science and engineering
scientific machine learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | PhysPDE: Rethinking PDE Discovery and a Physical Hypothesis Selection Benchmark · ICLR 2025 |
Mathematical optimization › discrete optimization
mixed integer linear programming |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | PhysPDE: Rethinking PDE Discovery and a Physical Hypothesis Selection Benchmark · ICLR 2025 |
Mathematical optimization › integer programming › mixed-integer optimization
mixed-integer nonlinear programming |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | PhysPDE: Rethinking PDE Discovery and a Physical Hypothesis Selection Benchmark · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
symbolic regression · 1.7search · 1.7mixed-integer programming · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | PhysPDE: Rethinking PDE Discovery and a Physical Hypothesis Selection BenchmarkabstractDespite extensive research, recovering PDE expressions from experimental observations often involves symbolic regression. This method generally lacks the incorporation of meaningful physical insights, resulting in outcomes lacking clear physical interpretations. Recognizing that the primary interest of Machine Learning for Science (ML4Sci) often lies in understanding the underlying physical mechanisms or even discovering new physical laws rather than simply obtaining mathematical expressions, this paper introduces a novel ML4Sci task paradigm. This paradigm focuses on interpreting experimental data within the framework of prior physical hypotheses and theories, thereby guiding and constraining the discovery of PDE expressions. We have formulated this approach as a nonlinear mixed-integer programming (MIP) problem, addressed through an efficient search scheme developed for this purpose. Our experiments on newly designed Fluid Mechanics and Laser Fusion datasets demonstrate the interpretability and feasibility of this method. Mingquan Feng, Bofang Jiang, Junchi Yan |
ICLR | 4 |