Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Bofang Jiang

dblp:410/3975 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational science and engineering · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational science and engineering › partial differential equations
partial differential equation discovery
0.912025
PhysPDE: Rethinking PDE Discovery and a Physical Hypothesis Selection Benchmark · ICLR 2025
Computational science and engineering
scientific machine learning
0.912025
PhysPDE: Rethinking PDE Discovery and a Physical Hypothesis Selection Benchmark · ICLR 2025
Mathematical optimization › discrete optimization
mixed integer linear programming
0.912025
PhysPDE: Rethinking PDE Discovery and a Physical Hypothesis Selection Benchmark · ICLR 2025
Mathematical optimization › integer programming › mixed-integer optimization
mixed-integer nonlinear programming
0.912025
PhysPDE: Rethinking PDE Discovery and a Physical Hypothesis Selection Benchmark · ICLR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

symbolic regression · 1.7search · 1.7mixed-integer programming · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 PhysPDE: Rethinking PDE Discovery and a Physical Hypothesis Selection Benchmark
abstract
Despite extensive research, recovering PDE expressions from experimental observations often involves symbolic regression. This method generally lacks the incorporation of meaningful physical insights, resulting in outcomes lacking clear physical interpretations. Recognizing that the primary interest of Machine Learning for Science (ML4Sci) often lies in understanding the underlying physical mechanisms or even discovering new physical laws rather than simply obtaining mathematical expressions, this paper introduces a novel ML4Sci task paradigm. This paradigm focuses on interpreting experimental data within the framework of prior physical hypotheses and theories, thereby guiding and constraining the discovery of PDE expressions. We have formulated this approach as a nonlinear mixed-integer programming (MIP) problem, addressed through an efficient search scheme developed for this purpose. Our experiments on newly designed Fluid Mechanics and Laser Fusion datasets demonstrate the interpretability and feasibility of this method.
Mingquan Feng, Bofang Jiang, Junchi Yan
ICLR4