Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Henrik Thillmann
dblp:410/4552
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
3D vision · 56% Face, body and person analysis · 44% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
human pose estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Systematic Comparison of Projection Methods for Monocular 3D Human Pose Estimation on Fisheye Images · ICRA 2025 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d human pose estimation
monocular 3d pose estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Systematic Comparison of Projection Methods for Monocular 3D Human Pose Estimation on Fisheye Images · ICRA 2025 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › camera calibration
camera model |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Systematic Comparison of Projection Methods for Monocular 3D Human Pose Estimation on Fisheye Images · ICRA 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
pinhole projection · 0.9equidistant projection · 0.9double sphere projection · 0.9cylindrical projection · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Systematic Comparison of Projection Methods for Monocular 3D Human Pose Estimation on Fisheye ImagesabstractFisheye cameras offer robots the ability to capture human movements across a wider field of view (FOV) than standard pinhole cameras, making them particularly useful for applications in human-robot interaction and automotive contexts. However, accurately detecting human poses in fisheye images is challenging due to the curved distortions inherent to fisheye optics. While various methods for undistorting fisheye images have been proposed, their effectiveness and limitations for poses that cover a wide FOV has not been systematically evaluated in the context of absolute human pose estimation from monocular fisheye images. To address this gap, we evaluate the impact of pinhole, equidistant and double sphere camera models, as well as cylindrical projection methods, on 3D human pose estimation accuracy. We find that in close-up scenarios, pinhole projection is inadequate, and the optimal projection method varies with the FOV covered by the human pose. The usage of advanced fisheye models like the double sphere model significantly enhances 3D human pose estimation accuracy. We propose a heuristic for selecting the appropriate projection model based on the detection bounding box to enhance prediction quality. Additionally, we introduce and evaluate on our novel FISHnCHIPS dataset, which features 3D human skeleton annotations in fisheye images, including images from unconventional angles, such as extreme close-ups, ground-mounted cameras, and wide-FOV poses, available at: https://www.vision.rwth-aachen.de/fishnchips. Stephanie Käs, Sven Peter, Henrik Thillmann, Anton Burenko, David B. Adrian, Dennis Mack, Timm Linder, Bastian Leibe |
ICRA | 3 |