Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Henrik Thillmann

dblp:410/4552 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
3D vision · 56% Face, body and person analysis · 44%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
human pose estimation
0.912025
Systematic Comparison of Projection Methods for Monocular 3D Human Pose Estimation on Fisheye Images · ICRA 2025
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d human pose estimation
monocular 3d pose estimation
0.912025
Systematic Comparison of Projection Methods for Monocular 3D Human Pose Estimation on Fisheye Images · ICRA 2025
Computer vision › 3D vision › camera calibration
camera model
0.312025
Systematic Comparison of Projection Methods for Monocular 3D Human Pose Estimation on Fisheye Images · ICRA 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

pinhole projection · 0.9equidistant projection · 0.9double sphere projection · 0.9cylindrical projection · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Systematic Comparison of Projection Methods for Monocular 3D Human Pose Estimation on Fisheye Images
abstract
Fisheye cameras offer robots the ability to capture human movements across a wider field of view (FOV) than standard pinhole cameras, making them particularly useful for applications in human-robot interaction and automotive contexts. However, accurately detecting human poses in fisheye images is challenging due to the curved distortions inherent to fisheye optics. While various methods for undistorting fisheye images have been proposed, their effectiveness and limitations for poses that cover a wide FOV has not been systematically evaluated in the context of absolute human pose estimation from monocular fisheye images. To address this gap, we evaluate the impact of pinhole, equidistant and double sphere camera models, as well as cylindrical projection methods, on 3D human pose estimation accuracy. We find that in close-up scenarios, pinhole projection is inadequate, and the optimal projection method varies with the FOV covered by the human pose. The usage of advanced fisheye models like the double sphere model significantly enhances 3D human pose estimation accuracy. We propose a heuristic for selecting the appropriate projection model based on the detection bounding box to enhance prediction quality. Additionally, we introduce and evaluate on our novel FISHnCHIPS dataset, which features 3D human skeleton annotations in fisheye images, including images from unconventional angles, such as extreme close-ups, ground-mounted cameras, and wide-FOV poses, available at: https://www.vision.rwth-aachen.de/fishnchips.
Stephanie Käs, Sven Peter, Henrik Thillmann, Anton Burenko, David B. Adrian, Dennis Mack, Timm Linder, Bastian Leibe
ICRA3