Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Marco E. Garza
dblp:410/5797
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0004-7666-5460ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Hardware security and side channels · 91% Cyber-physical and IoT security · 9% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Hardware security and side channels
intellectual property theft |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | One Video to Steal Them All: 3D-Printing IP Theft through Optical Side-Channels · CCS 2025 |
Hardware security and side channels › side-channel attack › physical side channel
optical side channel |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | One Video to Steal Them All: 3D-Printing IP Theft through Optical Side-Channels · CCS 2025 |
Hardware security and side channels
side-channel attack |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | One Video to Steal Them All: 3D-Printing IP Theft through Optical Side-Channels · CCS 2025 |
Cyber-physical and IoT security
3d printing security |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | One Video to Steal Them All: 3D-Printing IP Theft through Optical Side-Channels · CCS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
video analysis · 0.9trajectory reconstruction · 0.9equivalence checking · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | One Video to Steal Them All: 3D-Printing IP Theft through Optical Side-ChannelsabstractThe 3D printing industry is rapidly growing and increasingly adopted across various sectors, including manufacturing, healthcare, and defense. However, the operational setup often involves hazardous environments, necessitating remote monitoring through cameras and other sensors, which opens the door to cyber-based attacks. In this paper, we show that an adversary with access to video recordings of the 3D printing process can reverse-engineer the underlying 3D print instructions. Our model tracks the printer nozzle's movements during the printing process and maps the corresponding trajectory into G-code instructions. Further, it identifies the correct parameters, such as feed rate and extrusion rate, leading us to be able to successfully perform IP theft. To validate the success of IP theft, we design an equivalence checker that quantitatively compares two sets of 3D print instructions, evaluating their similarity in producing objects that are alike in shape, external appearance, and internal structure. Our equivalence checker, unlike other simple distance-based metrics such as normalized mean square error, is rotational as well as translational invariant. This is necessary to capture shifts in the base/start position of the reverse-engineered instructions relative to the actual 3D print instructions that can happen due to different camera positions. Our model achieves an average accuracy of 90.87% and generates 30.20% fewer instructions compared to the current state-of-the-art methods that produce instructions that either lead to faulty or incorrect (in terms of difference in shape and internal structure) 3D prints. Additionally, we use our model to reverse-engineer the 3D print instructions from a video recording and print a fully-functional counterfeit object. Twisha Chattopadhyay, Fabricio Ceschin, Marco E. Garza, Dymytriy Zyunkin, Animesh Chhotaray, Aaron P. Stebner, Saman A. Zonouz, Raheem A. Beyah |
CCS | 3 |