Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

De Zhang Lee

dblp:410/6242 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0003-4311-9028ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
2 papers
Security and privacy of machine learning · 62% Digital forensics and information hiding · 38%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Security and privacy of machine learning › federated learning defense
byzantine-robust aggregation
0.912025
A Practical and Secure Byzantine Robust Aggregator · CCS 2025
Digital forensics and information hiding › watermarking
generative model watermarking
0.912025
Removal Attack and Defense on AI-generated Content Latent-based Watermarking · CCS 2025
Security and privacy of machine learning
poisoning attack defense
0.912025
A Practical and Secure Byzantine Robust Aggregator · CCS 2025
Digital forensics and information hiding
watermarking
0.912025
Removal Attack and Defense on AI-generated Content Latent-based Watermarking · CCS 2025
Security and privacy of machine learning
watermark removal attack
0.912025
Removal Attack and Defense on AI-generated Content Latent-based Watermarking · CCS 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.312025
A Practical and Secure Byzantine Robust Aggregator · CCS 2025
Security and privacy of machine learning
generative model security
0.312025
Removal Attack and Defense on AI-generated Content Latent-based Watermarking · CCS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

robust aggregation · 1.7pseudorandom error-correcting code · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Removal Attack and Defense on AI-generated Content Latent-based Watermarking
abstract
Digital watermarks can be embedded into AI-generated content (AIGC) by initializing the generation process with starting points sampled from a secret distribution. When combined with pseudorandom error-correcting codes, such watermarked outputs can remain indistinguishable from unwatermarked objects, while maintaining robustness under whitenoise. In this paper, we go beyond indistinguishability and investigate security under removal attacks. We demonstrate that indistinguishability alone does not necessarily guarantee resistance to adversarial removal. Specifically, we propose a novel attack that exploits boundary information leaked by the locations of watermarked objects. This attack significantly reduces the distortion required to remove watermarks—by up to a factor of 15 × compared to a baseline whitenoise attack under certain settings. To mitigate such attacks, we introduce a defense mechanism that applies a secret transformation to hide the boundary, and prove that the secret transformation effectively rendering any attacker's perturbations equivalent to those of a naïve whitenoise adversary. Our empirical evaluations, conducted on multiple versions of Stable Diffusion, validate the effectiveness of both the attack and the proposed defense, highlighting the importance of addressing boundary leakage in latent-based watermarking schemes.
De Zhang Lee, Ee-Chien Chang
CCS1
2025 A Practical and Secure Byzantine Robust Aggregator
abstract
In machine learning security, one is often faced with the problem of removing outliers from a given set of high-dimensional vectors when computing their average. For example, many variants of data poisoning attacks produce gradient vectors during training that are outliers in the distribution of clean gradients, which bias the computed average used to derive the ML model. Filtering them out before averaging serves as a generic defense strategy. Byzantine robust aggregation is an algorithmic primitive which computes a robust average of vectors, in the presence of an ε fraction of vectors which may have been arbitrarily and adaptively corrupted, such that the resulting bias in the final average is provably bounded.
De Zhang Lee, Aashish Kolluri, Prateek Saxena, Ee-Chien Chang
CCS1