Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mohammad Mahdi Vahedi

dblp:410/6284 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Vision and language · 93% Image recognition and object detection · 7%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Vision and language › compositionality
binding problem
0.912025
Visual Structures Help Visual Reasoning: Addressing the Binding Problem in LVLMs · NeurIPS 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model
0.912025
Visual Structures Help Visual Reasoning: Addressing the Binding Problem in LVLMs · NeurIPS 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language
visual grounding
0.912025
Visual Structures Help Visual Reasoning: Addressing the Binding Problem in LVLMs · NeurIPS 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language
visual reasoning
0.912025
Visual Structures Help Visual Reasoning: Addressing the Binding Problem in LVLMs · NeurIPS 2025
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
visual search
0.312025
Visual Structures Help Visual Reasoning: Addressing the Binding Problem in LVLMs · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

visual input structuring · 0.9chain-of-thought prompting · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Visual Structures Help Visual Reasoning: Addressing the Binding Problem in LVLMs
abstract
Despite progress in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs), their capacity for visual reasoning is often limited by the binding problem: the failure to reliably associate perceptual features with their correct visual referents. This limitation underlies persistent errors in tasks such as counting, visual search, scene description, and spatial relationship understanding. A key factor is that current LVLMs process visual features largely in parallel, lacking mechanisms for spatially grounded, serial attention. This paper introduces Visual Input Structure for Enhanced Reasoning (VISER), a simple, effective method that augments visual inputs with low-level spatial structures and pairs them with a textual prompt that encourages sequential, spatially-aware parsing. We empirically demonstrate substantial performance improvements across core visual reasoning tasks, using only a single-query inference. Specifically, VISER improves GPT-4o performance on visual search, counting, and spatial relationship tasks by 25.0%, 26.8%, and 9.5%, respectively, and reduces edit distance error in scene description by 0.32 on 2D datasets. Furthermore, we find that the visual modification is essential for these gains; purely textual strategies, including Chain-of-Thought prompting, are insufficient and can even degrade performance. VISER underscores the importance of visual input design over purely linguistically based reasoning strategies and suggests that visual structuring is a powerful and general approach for enhancing compositional and spatial reasoning in LVLMs.
Amirmohammad Izadi, Mohammadali Banayeeanzade, Fatemeh Askari, Ali Rahimiakbar, Mohammad Mahdi Vahedi, Hosein Hasani, Mahdieh Soleymani Baghshah
NeurIPS5