EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mohamed S. Muneer
dblp:410/6351
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Vision and language · 87% Language models and text generation · 13% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Medical and health informatics · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Vision and language
multimodal in-context learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SMMILE: An expert-driven benchmark for multimodal medical in-context learning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SMMILE: An expert-driven benchmark for multimodal medical in-context learning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Medical and health informatics › medical report generation
radiology report generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Automated Structured Radiology Report Generation · ACL (1) 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text generation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Automated Structured Radiology Report Generation · ACL (1) 2025 |
Medical and health informatics › biomedical natural language processing › medical question answering
medical visual question answering |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | SMMILE: An expert-driven benchmark for multimodal medical in-context learning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
in-context learning · 1.7benchmarking · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Automated Structured Radiology Report GenerationabstractJean-Benoit Delbrouck, Justin Xu, Johannes Moll, Alois Thomas, Zhihong Chen, Sophie Ostmeier, Asfandyar Azhar, Kelvin Zhenghao Li, Andrew Johnston, Christian Bluethgen, Eduardo Pontes Reis, Mohamed S Muneer, Maya Varma, Curtis Langlotz. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025. Jean-Benoit Delbrouck, Justin Xu, Johannes Moll, Alois Thomas, Sophie Ostmeier, Asfandyar Azhar, Kelvin Zhenghao Li, Andrew Johnston, Christian Bluethgen, Eduardo Pontes Reis, Mohamed S. Muneer, Maya Varma, Curt Langlotz |
ACL (1) | 12 |
| 2025 | SMMILE: An expert-driven benchmark for multimodal medical in-context learningabstractMultimodal in-context learning (ICL) remains underexplored despite significant potential for domains such as medicine. Clinicians routinely encounter diverse, specialized tasks requiring adaptation from limited examples, such as drawing insights from a few relevant prior cases or considering a constrained set of differential diagnoses. While multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have shown advances in medical visual question answering (VQA), their ability to learn multimodal tasks from context is largely unknown. We introduce SMMILE, the first expert-driven multimodal ICL benchmark for medical tasks. Eleven medical experts curated problems, each including a multimodal query and multimodal in-context examples as task demonstrations. SMMILE encompasses 111 problems (517 question-image-answer triplets) covering 6 medical specialties and 13 imaging modalities. We further introduce SMMILE++, an augmented variant with 1038 permuted problems. A comprehensive evaluation of 15 MLLMs demonstrates that most models exhibit moderate to poor multimodal ICL ability in medical tasks. In open-ended evaluations, ICL contributes only an 8% average improvement over zero-shot on SMMILE and 9.4% on SMMILE++. We observe a susceptibility for irrelevant in-context examples: even a single noisy or irrelevant example can degrade performance by up to 9.5%. Moreover, we observe that MLLMs are affected by a recency bias, where placing the most relevant example last can lead to substantial performance improvements of up to 71%. Our findings highlight critical limitations and biases in current MLLMs when learning multimodal medical tasks from context. SMMILE is available at https://smmile-benchmark.github.io. Melanie Rieff, Maya Varma, Ossian Rabow, Subathra Adithan, Julie Kim, Ken Chang, Hannah Lee, Nidhi Rohatgi, Christian Bluethgen, Mohamed S. Muneer, Jean-Benoit Delbrouck, Michael Moor |
NeurIPS | 10 |