Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hwi-Yeol Yun

dblp:410/7846 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-8793-2449ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 75% Medical and health informatics · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Medical and health informatics › clinical prediction
clinical risk prediction
1.012026
Interpretable deep survival analysis of Alzheimer's disease via metabolic genetic variants · Bioinform. 2026
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics › gene-gene interaction
epistasis analysis
1.012026
Interpretable deep survival analysis of Alzheimer's disease via metabolic genetic variants · Bioinform. 2026
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics
genetic association study
1.012026
Interpretable deep survival analysis of Alzheimer's disease via metabolic genetic variants · Bioinform. 2026
Bioinformatics and computational biology
survival analysis
1.012026
Interpretable deep survival analysis of Alzheimer's disease via metabolic genetic variants · Bioinform. 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

weibull survival model · 1.0shapley additive explanations · 1.0feedforward neural network · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Interpretable deep survival analysis of Alzheimer's disease via metabolic genetic variants
abstract
BACKGROUND: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease. Traditional models for estimating AD onset cannot capture nonlinear interactions (epistasis) among the numerous genetic variables that contribute to AD risk. METHODS: We developed a feedforward neural network (FFN)-Weibull survival model to predict AD onset using large-scale single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data. We integrated an XAI technique, Shapley additive explanations (SHAP), to address the black-box nature of deep learning, interpret model predictions, and quantify the contribution of each genetic factor to AD. RESULTS: The FFN model achieved a mean concordance index of 0.647, demonstrating an approximately 3.6% improvement over the traditional linear baseline (0.625). The FFN-SHAP model validated established findings, identifying APOE E4 as a primary AD risk factor. APOE E2 strongly protected against AD. Metabolic-disorder-related SNPs had conflicting effects, suggesting gene-environment interactions influence AD onset. CONCLUSIONS: By effectively bypassing the combinatorial explosion of interaction terms, the predictive power of an FFN combined with XAI provides a robust methodological tool for identifying the genetic basis of complex diseases, even in cohorts with limited sample sizes. Our model generated novel testable hypotheses regarding the intricate roles of gene-gene and gene-environment interactions in AD pathogenesis.
Sungwoo Goo, Jung-woo Chae, Sangkeun Jung, Hwi-Yeol Yun
Bioinform.5
2024 Validity conditions of approximations for a target-mediated drug disposition model: A novel first-order approximation and its comparison to other approximations
abstract
Target-mediated drug disposition (TMDD) is a phenomenon characterized by a drug's high-affinity binding to a target molecule, which significantly influences its pharmacokinetic profile within an organism. The comprehensive TMDD model delineates this interaction, yet it may become overly complex and computationally demanding in the absence of specific concentration data for the target or its complexes. Consequently, simplified TMDD models employing quasi-steady state approximations (QSSAs) have been introduced; however, the precise conditions under which these models yield accurate results require further elucidation. Here, we establish the validity of three simplified TMDD models: the Michaelis-Menten model reduced with the standard QSSA (mTMDD), the QSS model reduced with the total QSSA (qTMDD), and a first-order approximation of the total QSSA (pTMDD). Specifically, we find that mTMDD is applicable only when initial drug concentrations substantially exceed total target concentrations, while qTMDD can be used for all drug concentrations. Notably, pTMDD offers a simpler and faster alternative to qTMDD, with broader applicability than mTMDD. These findings are confirmed with antibody-drug conjugate real-world data. Our findings provide a framework for selecting appropriate simplified TMDD models while ensuring accuracy, potentially enhancing drug development and facilitating safer, more personalized treatments.
Jong Hyuk Byun, Hye Seon Jeon, Hwi-Yeol Yun, Jae Kyoung Kim
PLoS Comput. Biol.3