Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nicola Viterbo

dblp:410/8368 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 50% Recommender systems · 25% Data mining · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Recommender systems › interactive recommendation
conversational recommendation
0.912025
CoSRec: A Joint Conversational Search and Recommendation Dataset · SIGIR 2025
Information retrieval › interactive information retrieval › conversational information seeking
conversational search
0.912025
CoSRec: A Joint Conversational Search and Recommendation Dataset · SIGIR 2025
Data mining
dataset construction
0.912025
CoSRec: A Joint Conversational Search and Recommendation Dataset · SIGIR 2025
Information retrieval
evaluation
0.912025
CoSRec: A Joint Conversational Search and Recommendation Dataset · SIGIR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

relevance judgment · 0.9human annotation · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 CoSRec: A Joint Conversational Search and Recommendation Dataset
abstract
Conversational Information Access systems have experienced widespread diffusion thanks to the natural and effortless interactions they enable with the user. In particular, they represent an effective interaction interface for conversational search (CS) and conversational recommendation (CR) scenarios. Despite their commonalities, CR and CS systems are often devised, developed, and evaluated as isolated components. Integrating these two elements would allow for handling complex information access scenarios, such as exploring unfamiliar recommended product aspects, enabling richer dialogues, and improving user satisfaction. As of today, the scarce availability of integrated datasets - focused exclusively on either of the tasks - limits the possibilities for evaluating by-design integrated CS and CR systems. To address this gap, we propose CoSRec, the first dataset for joint Conversational Search and Recommendation (CSR) evaluation. The CoSRec test set includes 20 high-quality conversations, with human-made annotations for the quality of conversations, and manually crafted relevance judgments for products and documents. Additionally, we provide supplementary training data comprising partially annotated dialogues and raw conversations to support diverse learning paradigms. CoSRec is the first resource to model CR and CS tasks in a unified framework, enabling the training and evaluation of systems that must shift between answering queries and making suggestions dynamically.
Marco Alessio, Simone Merlo, Tommaso Di Noia, Guglielmo Faggioli, Marco Ferrante, Nicola Ferro 0001, Cristina Ioana Muntean, Franco Maria Nardini, Fedelucio Narducci, Raffaele Perego 0001, Giuseppe Santucci, Nicola Viterbo
SIGIR12