Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nicola Viterbo
dblp:410/8368
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 50% Recommender systems · 25% Data mining · 25% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommender systems › interactive recommendation
conversational recommendation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | CoSRec: A Joint Conversational Search and Recommendation Dataset · SIGIR 2025 |
Information retrieval › interactive information retrieval › conversational information seeking
conversational search |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | CoSRec: A Joint Conversational Search and Recommendation Dataset · SIGIR 2025 |
Data mining
dataset construction |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | CoSRec: A Joint Conversational Search and Recommendation Dataset · SIGIR 2025 |
Information retrieval
evaluation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | CoSRec: A Joint Conversational Search and Recommendation Dataset · SIGIR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
relevance judgment · 0.9human annotation · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | CoSRec: A Joint Conversational Search and Recommendation DatasetabstractConversational Information Access systems have experienced widespread diffusion thanks to the natural and effortless interactions they enable with the user. In particular, they represent an effective interaction interface for conversational search (CS) and conversational recommendation (CR) scenarios. Despite their commonalities, CR and CS systems are often devised, developed, and evaluated as isolated components. Integrating these two elements would allow for handling complex information access scenarios, such as exploring unfamiliar recommended product aspects, enabling richer dialogues, and improving user satisfaction. As of today, the scarce availability of integrated datasets - focused exclusively on either of the tasks - limits the possibilities for evaluating by-design integrated CS and CR systems. To address this gap, we propose CoSRec, the first dataset for joint Conversational Search and Recommendation (CSR) evaluation. The CoSRec test set includes 20 high-quality conversations, with human-made annotations for the quality of conversations, and manually crafted relevance judgments for products and documents. Additionally, we provide supplementary training data comprising partially annotated dialogues and raw conversations to support diverse learning paradigms. CoSRec is the first resource to model CR and CS tasks in a unified framework, enabling the training and evaluation of systems that must shift between answering queries and making suggestions dynamically. Marco Alessio, Simone Merlo, Tommaso Di Noia, Guglielmo Faggioli, Marco Ferrante, Nicola Ferro 0001, Cristina Ioana Muntean, Franco Maria Nardini, Fedelucio Narducci, Raffaele Perego 0001, Giuseppe Santucci, Nicola Viterbo |
SIGIR | 12 |