Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Rishav Ranaut
dblp:410/8446
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0006-7587-3430ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information retrieval
text analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Text Obsoleteness Detection using Large Language Models · SIGIR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multi-task learning · 1.7large language model · 1.7fine-tuning · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Text Obsoleteness Detection using Large Language ModelsabstractMaintaining accurate and up-to-date information is a persistent challenge for large-scale knowledge repositories, where outdated content can compromise their value. In this paper, we present a Multitask learning framework that uses Large Language Models (LLMs) for two tasks: semantic update detection and semantic update necessity prediction. The update detection task identifies obsoleteness by comparing older and newer text versions, while the update necessity prediction task determines whether an update is required based on a given context. To support these tasks, we curate a specialized dataset from Wikipedia called SEMUPDATES, focusing on frequently updated articles. Our experiments with five LLMs across four datasets in zero-shot, few-shot, and fine-tuned settings demonstrate that fine-tuning significantly enhances performance. In the multitask learning setup, Qwen delivers the best overall performance, while Mistral achieves the highest accuracy on individual tasks when fine-tuned separately. However, the performance differences across models are not substantial, suggesting that multiple LLMs can be effectively adapted for content update automation. These findings highlight the potential of LLMs in detecting and predicting obsolescence, providing a scalable solution for maintaining the timeliness of digital knowledge repositories. Rishav Ranaut, Sriparna Saha 0001, Adam Jatowt, Manish Gupta 0001 |
SIGIR | 1 |