Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Shashwath Bharadwaj

dblp:410/9731 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
3D vision · 50% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 50%
Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Computational photography and imaging · 50% Image and video processing · 50%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision
depth estimation
0.912025
Free-Running vs. Synchronous: Single-Photon Lidar for High-Flux 3D Imaging · ICCV 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › parameter estimation
maximum likelihood estimation
0.912025
Free-Running vs. Synchronous: Single-Photon Lidar for High-Flux 3D Imaging · ICCV 2025
Image and video processing
image reconstruction
0.912025
Image Reconstruction from Readout-Multiplexed Single-Photon Detector Arrays · CVPR 2025
Computational photography and imaging
single-photon imaging
0.912025
Image Reconstruction from Readout-Multiplexed Single-Photon Detector Arrays · CVPR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

regularization · 1.7maximum likelihood estimation · 1.7learned point cloud score model · 1.7monte carlo simulation · 0.9inverse imaging · 0.9cramér-rao bound · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Image Reconstruction from Readout-Multiplexed Single-Photon Detector Arrays
abstract
Readout multiplexing is a promising solution to overcome hardware limitations and data bottlenecks in imaging with single-photon detectors. Conventional multiplexed readout processing creates an upper bound on photon counts at a very fine time scale, where frames with multiple detected photons must either be discarded or allowed to introduce significant bias. We formulate multiphoton coincidence resolution as an inverse imaging problem and introduce a solution framework to probabilistically resolve the spatial locations of photon incidences. Specifically, we develop a theoretical abstraction of row–column multiplexing and a model of photon events that make readouts ambiguous. Using this, we propose a novel estimator that spatially resolves up to four coincident photons. Monte Carlo simulations show that our proposed method increases the peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) of reconstruction by 3 to 4 dB compared to conventional methods under optimal incident flux conditions. Additionally, this method reduces the required number of readout frames to achieve the same mean-squared error as other methods by a factor of ~ 4. Finally, our method matches the Cramér–Rao bound for detection probability estimation for a wider range of incident flux values compared to conventional methods. While demonstrated for a specific detector type and readout architecture, this method can be extended to more general multiplexing with different detector models.
Shashwath Bharadwaj, Ruangrawee Kitichotkul, Akshay Agarwal 0003, Vivek K. Goyal
CVPR1
2025 Free-Running vs. Synchronous: Single-Photon Lidar for High-Flux 3D Imaging
abstract
Conventional wisdom suggests that single-photon lidar (SPL) should operate in low-light conditions to minimize dead-time effects. Many methods have been developed to mitigate these effects in synchronous SPL systems. However, solutions for free-running SPL remain limited despite the advantage of reduced histogram distortion from dead times. To improve the accuracy of free-running SPL, we propose a computationally efficient joint maximum likelihood estimator of the signal flux, the background flux, and the depth using only histograms, along with a complementary regularization framework that incorporates a learned point cloud score model as a prior. Simulations and experiments demonstrate that free-running SPL yields lower estimation errors than its synchronous counterpart under identical conditions, with our regularization further improving accuracy.
Ruangrawee Kitichotkul, Shashwath Bharadwaj, Joshua Rapp, Yanting Ma, Alexander Mehta, Vivek K. Goyal
ICCV2