Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Chenhe Hao
dblp:411/1495
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 82% Vision and language · 18% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | TOP-RL: Task-Optimized Progressive Token Pruning with Reinforcement Learning for Vision Language Models · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › token pruning
visual token pruning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | TOP-RL: Task-Optimized Progressive Token Pruning with Reinforcement Learning for Vision Language Models · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › data selection
coreset selection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | FedCS: Coreset Selection for Federated Learning · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distributed training |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | FedCS: Coreset Selection for Federated Learning · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
federated learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | FedCS: Coreset Selection for Federated Learning · CVPR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reinforcement learning · 1.0markov decision process · 1.0distance contrast · 0.9coreset selection · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | TOP-RL: Task-Optimized Progressive Token Pruning with Reinforcement Learning for Vision Language ModelsabstractIn recent years, Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have significantly advanced multimodal tasks. However, their inference requires intensive processing of numerous visual tokens and incurs substantial computational overhead. Existing methods typically compress visual tokens either at the input stage or in early model layers, ignoring variations across tasks and depths. To address these limitations, we introduce TOP-RL, a Task-Optimized Progressive token pruning framework based on Reinforcement Learning. TOP-RL formulates visual token pruning as a multi-stage Markov Decision Process (MDP). It employs an agent trained with dense and fine-grained reward signals to progressively generate differentiable binary masks. This enables TOP-RL to adaptively select crucial visual tokens tailored to each task, effectively balancing accuracy and computational efficiency. Extensive experiments on leading multimodal datasets and advanced LVLMs validate that TOP-RL effectively learns task-optimized pruning policies, significantly boosting inference efficiency while preserving robust performance. For instance, LLaVA-NeXT equipped with TOP-RL achieves a 1.9x speedup in inference time and a 9.3x reduction in FLOPs, with 96% performance preserved. Hengyi Wang, Weiying Xie, Yaotao Wei, Kai Jiang 0001, Mingxiang Cao, Chenhe Hao, Leyuan Fang |
AAAI | 7 |
| 2025 | FedCS: Coreset Selection for Federated LearningabstractFederated Learning (FL) is an emerging direction in distributed machine learning that enables jointly training a model without sharing the data. However, as the size of datasets grows exponentially, computational costs of FL increase. In this paper, we propose the first Coreset Selection criterion for Federated Learning (FedCS) by exploring the Distance Contrast (DC) in feature space. Our FedCS is inspired by the discovery that DC can indicate the intrinsic properties inherent to samples regardless of the networks. Based on the observation, we develop a method that is mathematically formulated to prune samples with high DC. The principle behind our pruning is that high DC samples either contain less information or represent rare extreme cases, thus removal of them can enhance the aggregation performance. Besides, we experimentally show that samples with low DC usually contain substantial information and reflect the common features of samples within their classes, such that they are suitable for constructing coreset. With only two time of linear-logarithmic complexity operation, FedCS leads to significant improvements over the methods using whole dataset in terms of computational costs, with similar accuracies. For example, on the CIFAR-10 dataset with Dirichlet coefficient α = 0.1, FedCS achieves 58.88% accuracy using only 44% of the entire dataset, whereas other methods require twice the data volume as FedCS for same performance. Chenhe Hao, Weiying Xie, Daixun Li, Hangyu Ye, Leyuan Fang, Yunsong Li 0001 |
CVPR | 1 |