Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Simone Teglia
dblp:411/4194
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0003-1227-1545ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Information extraction and text analysis · 33% Language models and text generation · 33% Representation and self-supervised learning · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
pre-trained language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | How Much Do Encoder Models Know About Word Senses? · ACL (1) 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
probing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | How Much Do Encoder Models Know About Word Senses? · ACL (1) 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
word sense disambiguation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | How Much Do Encoder Models Know About Word Senses? · ACL (1) 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
probing · 0.9centroid similarity · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | How Much Do Encoder Models Know About Word Senses?abstractWord Sense Disambiguation (WSD) is a key task in Natural Language Processing (NLP), involving selecting the correct meaning of a word based on its context.With Pretrained Language Models (PLMs) like BERT and DeBERTa now well established, significant progress has been made in understanding contextual semantics.Nevertheless, how well these models inherently disambiguate word senses remains uncertain.In this work, we evaluate several encoder-only PLMs across two popular inventories (i.e.WordNet and the Oxford Dictionary of English) by analyzing their ability to separate word senses without any task-specific finetuning.We compute centroids of word senses and measure similarity to assess performance across different layers.Our results show that DeBERTa-v3 delivers the best performance on the task, with the middle layers (specifically the 7th and 8th layers) achieving the highest accuracy, outperforming the output layer by approximately 15 percentage points.Our experiments also explore the inherent structure of Word-Net and ODE sense inventories, highlighting their influence on the overall model behavior and performance.Finally, based on our findings, we develop a small, efficient model for the WSD task that attains robust performance while significantly reducing the carbon footprint.We publicly release our software at http: //github.com/SapienzaNLP/wsd-probing. Simone Teglia, Simone Tedeschi, Roberto Navigli |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2025 | R3ST: A Synthetic 3D Dataset with Realistic Trajectories
Simone Teglia, Claudia Melis Tonti, Francesco Pro, Leonardo Russo, Andrea Alfarano, Matteo Pentassuglia, Irene Amerini |
CAIP (2) | 1 |