Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Simone Teglia

dblp:411/4194 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0003-1227-1545ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 33% Language models and text generation · 33% Representation and self-supervised learning · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
pre-trained language model
0.912025
How Much Do Encoder Models Know About Word Senses? · ACL (1) 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
probing
0.912025
How Much Do Encoder Models Know About Word Senses? · ACL (1) 2025
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
word sense disambiguation
0.912025
How Much Do Encoder Models Know About Word Senses? · ACL (1) 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

probing · 0.9centroid similarity · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 How Much Do Encoder Models Know About Word Senses?
abstract
Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) is a key task in Natural Language Processing (NLP), involving selecting the correct meaning of a word based on its context.With Pretrained Language Models (PLMs) like BERT and DeBERTa now well established, significant progress has been made in understanding contextual semantics.Nevertheless, how well these models inherently disambiguate word senses remains uncertain.In this work, we evaluate several encoder-only PLMs across two popular inventories (i.e.WordNet and the Oxford Dictionary of English) by analyzing their ability to separate word senses without any task-specific finetuning.We compute centroids of word senses and measure similarity to assess performance across different layers.Our results show that DeBERTa-v3 delivers the best performance on the task, with the middle layers (specifically the 7th and 8th layers) achieving the highest accuracy, outperforming the output layer by approximately 15 percentage points.Our experiments also explore the inherent structure of Word-Net and ODE sense inventories, highlighting their influence on the overall model behavior and performance.Finally, based on our findings, we develop a small, efficient model for the WSD task that attains robust performance while significantly reducing the carbon footprint.We publicly release our software at http: //github.com/SapienzaNLP/wsd-probing.
Simone Teglia, Simone Tedeschi, Roberto Navigli
ACL (1)1
2025 R3ST: A Synthetic 3D Dataset with Realistic Trajectories
Simone Teglia, Claudia Melis Tonti, Francesco Pro, Leonardo Russo, Andrea Alfarano, Matteo Pentassuglia, Irene Amerini
CAIP (2)1