Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lintao Long

dblp:411/4381 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Language models and text generation · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation › grammatical error correction
chinese grammatical error correction
1.012026
Intuitive Thinking: Expanding Large Language Models' Thinking for Rapid Decision-Making on Candidate Corrections in Chinese Grammar Error Correction · AAAI 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
grammatical error correction
1.012026
Intuitive Thinking: Expanding Large Language Models' Thinking for Rapid Decision-Making on Candidate Corrections in Chinese Grammar Error Correction · AAAI 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model reasoning
1.012026
Intuitive Thinking: Expanding Large Language Models' Thinking for Rapid Decision-Making on Candidate Corrections in Chinese Grammar Error Correction · AAAI 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
chain-of-thought reasoning
0.912025
Exclusion of Thought: Mitigating Cognitive Load in Large Language Models for Enhanced Reasoning in Multiple-Choice Tasks · ACL (1) 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › natural language understanding › question answering
multiple-choice question answering
0.912025
Exclusion of Thought: Mitigating Cognitive Load in Large Language Models for Enhanced Reasoning in Multiple-Choice Tasks · ACL (1) 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

intuitive thinking model · 1.0fine-tuning · 1.0reasoning prompt strategy · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Intuitive Thinking: Expanding Large Language Models' Thinking for Rapid Decision-Making on Candidate Corrections in Chinese Grammar Error Correction
abstract
Chinese Grammar Error Correction (CGEC) aims to identify and correct grammatical errors in Chinese sentences. Fine-tuning Large Language Models (LLMs) is a popular current method. However, we have observed a significant flaw: LLMs learn grammatical knowledge but often fail to explicitly use specific grammatical concepts to correct erroneous sentences, leading to multiple corrections without a clear indication of which is the most reliable. Humans possess an "intuitive thinking" mode, which allows them to quickly decide which correction is more reliable based on experience and intuition. To address this deficiency in LLMs, we propose the Expanding Intuitive Thinking Model (ExIT). ExIT extends the thinking process of LLMs for CGEC, providing them with a human-like rapid decision-making process. This enables LLMs to quickly select a more reliable correction from multiple alternatives based on experience and intuition. Unlike the LLM decoding process, which focuses only on the trustworthiness of local tokens, this is a global thinking process concerning the erroneous sentence and its correction. ExIT is a lightweight model that performs rapid computations without significantly increasing overhead. Our experimental results on CGEC datasets demonstrate that the proposed ExIT can substantially unleash the error correction potential of LLMs.
Lintao Long, Ruizhang Huang, Ruina Bai, Yongbin Qin, Qihang Fu
AAAI1
2025 Exclusion of Thought: Mitigating Cognitive Load in Large Language Models for Enhanced Reasoning in Multiple-Choice Tasks
abstract
Multiple-choice questions (MCQs) are a widely used and vital assessment format for evaluating large language models (LLMs). This study reveals that LLMs are susceptible to “cognitive load” caused by distractor options in MCQs, leading to excessive attention to distractors and consequent vacillation between correct and incorrect options. To mitigate this cognitive burden, we introduce a novel reasoning prompt strategy, called EoT, which effectively reduces cognitive load by steering the model’s attention away from erroneous options. This enables the model to focus more effectively on reasonable answers. Additionally, by documenting the elimination process, EoT enhances the transparency and interpretability of the model’s reasoning. Experimental results demonstrate that EoT, as a plug-and-play approach, significantly reduces cognitive load and improves performance, showcasing its potential to enhance both the accuracy and interpretability of LLMs.
Qihang Fu, Yongbin Qin, Ruizhang Huang, Yanping Chen 0010, Lintao Long
ACL (1)6