Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Maosongcao

dblp:411/4468 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Language models and text generation · 54% Vision and language · 46%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Compilers and program optimization · 33% Program synthesis and code generation · 33% Software testing · 33%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
alignment
1.722025
OmniAlign-V: Towards Enhanced Alignment of MLLMs with Human Preference · ACL (1) 2025
Condor: Enhance LLM Alignment with Knowledge-Driven Data Synthesis and Refinement · ACL (1) 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language
cross-modal alignment
0.912025
OmniAlign-V: Towards Enhanced Alignment of MLLMs with Human Preference · ACL (1) 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model
0.912025
OmniAlign-V: Towards Enhanced Alignment of MLLMs with Human Preference · ACL (1) 2025
Compilers and program optimization
code generation
0.912025
Rethinking Verification for LLM Code Generation: From Generation to Testing · NeurIPS 2025
Program synthesis and code generation
code generation evaluation
0.912025
Rethinking Verification for LLM Code Generation: From Generation to Testing · NeurIPS 2025
Software testing
test generation
0.912025
Rethinking Verification for LLM Code Generation: From Generation to Testing · NeurIPS 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
instruction tuning
0.312025
Condor: Enhance LLM Alignment with Knowledge-Driven Data Synthesis and Refinement · ACL (1) 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards · 0.9large language model · 0.9knowledge-driven data synthesis · 0.9human preference alignment · 0.9data refinement · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Condor: Enhance LLM Alignment with Knowledge-Driven Data Synthesis and Refinement
abstract
Maosongcao Maosongcao, Taolin Zhang, Mo Li, Chuyu Zhang, Yunxin Liu, Conghui He, Haodong Duan, Songyang Zhang, Kai Chen. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025.
Maosongcao, Taolin Zhang 0003, Mo Li 0012, Chuyu Zhang, Conghui He, Haodong Duan, Songyang Zhang 0001, Kai Chen 0026
ACL (1)1
2025 OmniAlign-V: Towards Enhanced Alignment of MLLMs with Human Preference
abstract
Xiangyu Zhao, Shengyuan Ding, Zicheng Zhang, Haian Huang, Maosongcao Maosongcao, Jiaqi Wang, Weiyun Wang, Xinyu Fang, Wenhai Wang, Guangtao Zhai, Hua Yang, Haodong Duan, Kai Chen. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025.
Shengyuan Ding, Haian Huang, Maosongcao, Jiaqi Wang 0003, Weiyun Wang, Xinyu Fang, Wenhai Wang, Guangtao Zhai, Hua Yang 0001, Haodong Duan, Kai Chen 0026
ACL (1)5
2025 Rethinking Verification for LLM Code Generation: From Generation to Testing
abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have recently achieved notable success in code‑generation benchmarks such as HumanEval and LiveCodeBench. However, a detailed examination reveals that these evaluation suites often comprise only a limited number of homogeneous test cases, resulting in subtle faults going undetected. This not only artificially inflates measured performance but also compromises accurate reward estimation in reinforcement learning frameworks utilizing verifiable rewards (RLVR). To address these critical shortcomings, we systematically investigate the test-case generation (TCG) task by proposing multi-dimensional metrics designed to rigorously quantify test-suite thoroughness. Furthermore, we introduce a human-LLM collaborative method (SAGA), leveraging human programming expertise with LLM reasoning capability, aimed at significantly enhancing both the coverage and the quality of generated test cases. In addition, we develop a TCGBench to facilitate the study of the TCG task. Experiments show that SAGA achieves a detection rate of 90.62\% and a verifier accuracy of 32.58\% on TCGBench. The Verifier Accuracy (Verifier Acc) of the code generation evaluation benchmark synthesized by SAGA is 10.78\% higher than that of LiveCodeBench-v6. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed method. We hope this work contributes to building a scalable foundation for reliable LLM code evaluation, further advancing RLVR in code generation, and paving the way for automated adversarial test synthesis and adaptive benchmark integration.
Zihan Ma 0010, Taolin Zhang 0003, Maosongcao, Minnan Luo, Songyang Zhang 0001, Kai Chen 0026
NeurIPS3