Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Maosongcao
dblp:411/4468
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Language models and text generation · 54% Vision and language · 46% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Compilers and program optimization · 33% Program synthesis and code generation · 33% Software testing · 33% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
alignment |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | OmniAlign-V: Towards Enhanced Alignment of MLLMs with Human Preference · ACL (1) 2025 Condor: Enhance LLM Alignment with Knowledge-Driven Data Synthesis and Refinement · ACL (1) 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
cross-modal alignment |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | OmniAlign-V: Towards Enhanced Alignment of MLLMs with Human Preference · ACL (1) 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | OmniAlign-V: Towards Enhanced Alignment of MLLMs with Human Preference · ACL (1) 2025 |
Compilers and program optimization
code generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Rethinking Verification for LLM Code Generation: From Generation to Testing · NeurIPS 2025 |
Program synthesis and code generation
code generation evaluation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Rethinking Verification for LLM Code Generation: From Generation to Testing · NeurIPS 2025 |
Software testing
test generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Rethinking Verification for LLM Code Generation: From Generation to Testing · NeurIPS 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
instruction tuning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Condor: Enhance LLM Alignment with Knowledge-Driven Data Synthesis and Refinement · ACL (1) 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards · 0.9large language model · 0.9knowledge-driven data synthesis · 0.9human preference alignment · 0.9data refinement · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Condor: Enhance LLM Alignment with Knowledge-Driven Data Synthesis and RefinementabstractMaosongcao Maosongcao, Taolin Zhang, Mo Li, Chuyu Zhang, Yunxin Liu, Conghui He, Haodong Duan, Songyang Zhang, Kai Chen. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025. Maosongcao, Taolin Zhang 0003, Mo Li 0012, Chuyu Zhang, Conghui He, Haodong Duan, Songyang Zhang 0001, Kai Chen 0026 |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2025 | OmniAlign-V: Towards Enhanced Alignment of MLLMs with Human PreferenceabstractXiangyu Zhao, Shengyuan Ding, Zicheng Zhang, Haian Huang, Maosongcao Maosongcao, Jiaqi Wang, Weiyun Wang, Xinyu Fang, Wenhai Wang, Guangtao Zhai, Hua Yang, Haodong Duan, Kai Chen. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025. Shengyuan Ding, Haian Huang, Maosongcao, Jiaqi Wang 0003, Weiyun Wang, Xinyu Fang, Wenhai Wang, Guangtao Zhai, Hua Yang 0001, Haodong Duan, Kai Chen 0026 |
ACL (1) | 5 |
| 2025 | Rethinking Verification for LLM Code Generation: From Generation to TestingabstractLarge language models (LLMs) have recently achieved notable success in code‑generation benchmarks such as HumanEval and LiveCodeBench. However, a detailed examination reveals that these evaluation suites often comprise only a limited number of homogeneous test cases, resulting in subtle faults going undetected. This not only artificially inflates measured performance but also compromises accurate reward estimation in reinforcement learning frameworks utilizing verifiable rewards (RLVR). To address these critical shortcomings, we systematically investigate the test-case generation (TCG) task by proposing multi-dimensional metrics designed to rigorously quantify test-suite thoroughness. Furthermore, we introduce a human-LLM collaborative method (SAGA), leveraging human programming expertise with LLM reasoning capability, aimed at significantly enhancing both the coverage and the quality of generated test cases. In addition, we develop a TCGBench to facilitate the study of the TCG task. Experiments show that SAGA achieves a detection rate of 90.62\% and a verifier accuracy of 32.58\% on TCGBench. The Verifier Accuracy (Verifier Acc) of the code generation evaluation benchmark synthesized by SAGA is 10.78\% higher than that of LiveCodeBench-v6. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed method. We hope this work contributes to building a scalable foundation for reliable LLM code evaluation, further advancing RLVR in code generation, and paving the way for automated adversarial test synthesis and adaptive benchmark integration. Zihan Ma 0010, Taolin Zhang 0003, Maosongcao, Minnan Luo, Songyang Zhang 0001, Kai Chen 0026 |
NeurIPS | 3 |