Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Zachary Gottesman

dblp:411/4481 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Language models and text generation · 77% Trustworthy machine learning · 17% Information extraction and text analysis · 6%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Learning and educational technologies · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation › domain-specific text generation
educational content generation
1.012026
EDUMATH: Generating Standards-aligned Educational Math Word Problems · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
math word problem generation
1.012026
EDUMATH: Generating Standards-aligned Educational Math Word Problems · ACL (1) 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.912025
Math Neurosurgery: Isolating Language Models' Math Reasoning Abilities Using Only Forward Passes · ACL (1) 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
mathematical reasoning
0.912025
Math Neurosurgery: Isolating Language Models' Math Reasoning Abilities Using Only Forward Passes · ACL (1) 2025
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
temporal information extraction
0.312026
Inferring Events from Time Series using Language Models · ACL (1) 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

standards-aligned generation · 2.0language model · 1.0pruning · 0.9forward passes · 0.9activation analysis · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 EDUMATH: Generating Standards-aligned Educational Math Word Problems
abstract
Bryan R Christ, Penelope Molitz, Beau LeBlond, Zachary Gottesman, Jonathan Kropko, Thomas Hartvigsen. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026.
Bryan R. Christ, Penelope Molitz, Beau LeBlond, Zachary Gottesman, Jonathan Kropko, Thomas Hartvigsen
ACL (1)4
2026 Inferring Events from Time Series using Language Models
abstract
Mingtian Tan, Mike A Merrill, Zachary Gottesman, Tim Althoff, David Evans, Thomas Hartvigsen. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026.
Mingtian Tan, Mike A. Merrill, Zachary Gottesman, Tim Althoff, Thomas Hartvigsen
ACL (1)3
2025 Math Neurosurgery: Isolating Language Models' Math Reasoning Abilities Using Only Forward Passes
abstract
Math reasoning is an active area of Large Language Model (LLM) research because it is a hallmark of artificial intelligence and has implications in several domains, including math education. However, few works have explored how math reasoning is encoded within LLM parameters and if it is a skill that can be isolated within models. Doing so could allow targeted intervention to improve math performance without altering non-math behavior and foster understanding of how models encode math reasoning. We introduce Math Neurosurgery (MathNeuro), a computationally efficient method we use to isolate math-specific parameters in LLMs using only forward passes. MathNeuro builds on existing work by using weights and activations to calculate parameter importance, but isolates math-specific parameters by filtering out those important for general language tasks. Through pruning parameters MathNeuro identifies, we delete a LLM’s math reasoning ability without significantly impacting its general language ability. Scaling the identified parameters by a small constant improves a pretrained or instruction-tuned LLM’s performance by 4-17% on GSM8K and 5-35% on MATH while leaving non-math behavior unaltered. MathNeuro is also data efficient: most of its effectiveness holds when identifying math-specific parameters using a single sample. MathNeuro highlights the potential for future work to intervene on math-specific parameters.
Bryan R. Christ, Zachary Gottesman, Jonathan Kropko, Thomas Hartvigsen
ACL (1)2