EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Qihang Fu
dblp:411/4626
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Language models and text generation · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation › grammatical error correction
chinese grammatical error correction |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Intuitive Thinking: Expanding Large Language Models' Thinking for Rapid Decision-Making on Candidate Corrections in Chinese Grammar Error Correction · AAAI 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
grammatical error correction |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Intuitive Thinking: Expanding Large Language Models' Thinking for Rapid Decision-Making on Candidate Corrections in Chinese Grammar Error Correction · AAAI 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model reasoning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Intuitive Thinking: Expanding Large Language Models' Thinking for Rapid Decision-Making on Candidate Corrections in Chinese Grammar Error Correction · AAAI 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
chain-of-thought reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Exclusion of Thought: Mitigating Cognitive Load in Large Language Models for Enhanced Reasoning in Multiple-Choice Tasks · ACL (1) 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › natural language understanding › question answering
multiple-choice question answering |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Exclusion of Thought: Mitigating Cognitive Load in Large Language Models for Enhanced Reasoning in Multiple-Choice Tasks · ACL (1) 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
intuitive thinking model · 1.0fine-tuning · 1.0reasoning prompt strategy · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Intuitive Thinking: Expanding Large Language Models' Thinking for Rapid Decision-Making on Candidate Corrections in Chinese Grammar Error CorrectionabstractChinese Grammar Error Correction (CGEC) aims to identify and correct grammatical errors in Chinese sentences. Fine-tuning Large Language Models (LLMs) is a popular current method. However, we have observed a significant flaw: LLMs learn grammatical knowledge but often fail to explicitly use specific grammatical concepts to correct erroneous sentences, leading to multiple corrections without a clear indication of which is the most reliable. Humans possess an "intuitive thinking" mode, which allows them to quickly decide which correction is more reliable based on experience and intuition. To address this deficiency in LLMs, we propose the Expanding Intuitive Thinking Model (ExIT). ExIT extends the thinking process of LLMs for CGEC, providing them with a human-like rapid decision-making process. This enables LLMs to quickly select a more reliable correction from multiple alternatives based on experience and intuition. Unlike the LLM decoding process, which focuses only on the trustworthiness of local tokens, this is a global thinking process concerning the erroneous sentence and its correction. ExIT is a lightweight model that performs rapid computations without significantly increasing overhead. Our experimental results on CGEC datasets demonstrate that the proposed ExIT can substantially unleash the error correction potential of LLMs. Lintao Long, Ruizhang Huang, Ruina Bai, Yongbin Qin, Qihang Fu |
AAAI | 5 |
| 2025 | Exclusion of Thought: Mitigating Cognitive Load in Large Language Models for Enhanced Reasoning in Multiple-Choice TasksabstractMultiple-choice questions (MCQs) are a widely used and vital assessment format for evaluating large language models (LLMs). This study reveals that LLMs are susceptible to “cognitive load” caused by distractor options in MCQs, leading to excessive attention to distractors and consequent vacillation between correct and incorrect options. To mitigate this cognitive burden, we introduce a novel reasoning prompt strategy, called EoT, which effectively reduces cognitive load by steering the model’s attention away from erroneous options. This enables the model to focus more effectively on reasonable answers. Additionally, by documenting the elimination process, EoT enhances the transparency and interpretability of the model’s reasoning. Experimental results demonstrate that EoT, as a plug-and-play approach, significantly reduces cognitive load and improves performance, showcasing its potential to enhance both the accuracy and interpretability of LLMs. Qihang Fu, Yongbin Qin, Ruizhang Huang, Yanping Chen 0010, Lintao Long |
ACL (1) | 1 |