Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Izzie Zahorian

dblp:412/3894 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0008-7210-4710ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Usable security · 77% Privacy and data protection · 23%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Usable security
at-risk users
0.912025
Supporting the Digital Safety of At-Risk Users: Lessons Learned from 9+ Years of Research and Training · ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 2025
Privacy and data protection
vulnerable populations
0.312025
Supporting the Digital Safety of At-Risk Users: Lessons Learned from 9+ Years of Research and Training · ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

framework development · 0.9design principles · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Supporting the Digital Safety of At-Risk Users: Lessons Learned from 9+ Years of Research and Training
abstract
Creating information technologies intended for broad use that allow everyone to participate safely online—which we refer to as inclusive digital safety —requires understanding and addressing the digital-safety needs of a diverse range of users who face elevated risk of technology-facilitated attacks or disproportionate harm from such attacks—i.e., at-risk users . This article draws from more than 9 years of our work at Google to understand and support the digital safety of at-risk users—including survivors of intimate partner abuse, people involved with political campaigns, content creators, youth, and more—in technology intended for broad use. Among our learnings is that designing for inclusive digital safety across widely varied user needs and dynamic contexts is a wicked problem with no “correct” solution. Given this, we describe frameworks and design principles we have developed to help make at-risk research findings practically applicable to technologies intended for broad use and lessons we have learned about communicating them to practitioners.
Tara Matthews, Elie Bursztein, Patrick Gage Kelley, Lea Kissner, Andreas Kramm, Andrew Oplinger, Andreas Schou, Manya Sleeper, Stephan Somogyi, Dalila Szostak, Kurt Thomas, Anna Turner, Jill Palzkill Woelfer, Lawrence You, Izzie Zahorian, Sunny Consolvo
ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact.15