Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mengnv Xing

dblp:412/7775 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program synthesis and code generation · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Program synthesis and code generation
code generation with language models
1.012026
FIXME: Towards End-to-End Benchmarking of LLM-Aided Design Verification · AAAI 2026
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
functional verification
1.012026
FIXME: Towards End-to-End Benchmarking of LLM-Aided Design Verification · AAAI 2026
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
hardware verification
1.012026
FIXME: Towards End-to-End Benchmarking of LLM-Aided Design Verification · AAAI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large language model · 2.0benchmarking · 2.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 FIXME: Towards End-to-End Benchmarking of LLM-Aided Design Verification
abstract
Despite the transformative potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) in hardware design, a comprehensive evaluation of their capabilities in design verification remains underexplored. Current efforts predominantly focus on RTL generation and basic debugging, overlooking the critical domain of functional verification, which is the primary bottleneck in modern design methodologies due to the rapid escalation of hardware complexity. We present FIXME, the first end-to-end, multi-model, and open-source evaluation framework for assessing LLM performance in hardware functional verification (FV) to address this crucial gap. FIXME introduces a structured three-level difficulty hierarchy spanning six verification sub-domains and 180 diverse tasks, enabling in-depth analysis across the design lifecycle. Leveraging a collaborative AI-human approach, we construct a high-quality dataset using 100% silicon-proven designs, ensuring comprehensive coverage of real-world challenges. Furthermore, we enhance the functional coverage by 45.57% through expert-guided optimization. By rigorously evaluating state-of-the-art LLMs such as GPT-4, Claude3, and LlaMA3, we identify key areas for improvement and outline promising research directions to unlock the full potential of LLM-driven automation in hardware design verification. The benchmark is available at https://github.com/ChatDesignVerification/FIXME.
Gwok-Waa Wan, Sam-Zaak Wong, Shengchu Su, Chenxu Niu 0001, Ning Wang 0071, Xinlai Wan, Qixiang Chen, Mengnv Xing, Jianmin Ye, Rongchang Song, Qiang Xu 0001, Nan Guan, Zhe Jiang 0004, Xi Wang 0009, Yong Chen 0001, Jun Yang 0006
AAAI8
2026 ChatTest: Coverage-Enhanced Testbench Generation for Agile Hardware Verification with LLMs
abstract
The growing complexity of modern hardware designs has rendered traditional functional verification increasingly time-consuming, with verification costs now dominating the design cycle. While large language models (LLMs) show promise in automating testbench generation, existing approaches struggle with real-world scalability, suffering from poor comprehension of long specifications and complex designs. To address these challenges, we propose ChatTest, a novel, end-to-end, multi-agent LLM framework for coverage-aware, agile hardware verification. Our key innovation lies in a function-mapped, divide-and-conquer architecture that integrates a Verification Description Language (VDL)—a structured, LLM-friendly DSL for precise specification encoding—with Constraint-Aware Segmental Adaptation (CASA) to enable coherent processing of long, heterogeneous design documents. By leveraging retrieval-augmented generation and supervised fine-tuning using multi-hierarchical specification-code alignment, ChatTest ensures accurate translation of functional points into targeted test stimuli. Furthermore, we introduce a coverage-driven feedback loop for automated test augmentation. Evaluated on a new benchmark of 20 complex RTL designs (up to 31K tokens of specification and 4K line-of-code), ChatTest achieves 1.46× higher toggle coverage and 2.28× higher line coverage than SOTA, with a 24.23% improvement in functional coverage, demonstrating its effectiveness in accelerating verification convergence.
Gwok-Waa Wan, Shengchu Su, Sam-Zaak Wong, Mengnv Xing, Zhe Jiang 0004, Xi Wang 0009, Jun Yang 0006
DATE5