EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Angel David Reyero Lobo
dblp:412/7960
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 60% Trustworthy machine learning · 40% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
causal inference |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Measuring Variable Importance in Heterogeneous Treatment Effects with Confidence · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference › heterogeneous treatment effect estimation
conditional average treatment effect |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Measuring Variable Importance in Heterogeneous Treatment Effects with Confidence · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
feature importance |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Measuring Variable Importance in Heterogeneous Treatment Effects with Confidence · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
heterogeneous treatment effect estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Measuring Variable Importance in Heterogeneous Treatment Effects with Confidence · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Measuring Variable Importance in Heterogeneous Treatment Effects with Confidence · ICML 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
leave-one-covariate-out · 0.9conditional permutation importance · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | A primer on linear classification with missing dataabstractSupervised learning with missing data aims at building the best prediction of a target output based on partially-observed inputs. Major approaches to address this problem can be decomposed into $(i)$ impute-then-predict strategies, which first fill in the empty input components and then apply a unique predictor and $(ii)$ Pattern-by-Pattern (P-b-P) approaches, where a predictor is built on each missing pattern. In this paper, we theoretically analyze how three classical linear classifiers, namely perceptron, logistic regression and linear discriminant analysis (LDA), behave with Missing Completely At Random (MCAR) data, depending on the strategy (imputation or P-b-P) to handle missing values. We prove that both imputation and P-b-P approaches are ill-specified in a logistic regression framework, thus questioning the relevance of such approaches to handle missing data. The most favorable auspices to perform classification with missing data concern P-b-P LDA methods. We provide finite-sample bounds for the excess risk in this framework, even for high-dimensional settings or MNAR data. Experiments illustrate our theoretical findings. Angel David Reyero Lobo, Alexis Ayme, Claire Boyer, Erwan Scornet |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2025 | Measuring Variable Importance in Heterogeneous Treatment Effects with ConfidenceabstractCausal machine learning (ML) promises to provide powerful tools for estimating individual treatment effects. While causal methods have placed some emphasis on heterogeneity in treatment response, it is of paramount importance to clarify the nature of this heterogeneity, by highlighting which variables drive it. We propose PermuCATE, an algorithm based on the Conditional Permutation Importance (CPI) method, for statistically rigorous global variable importance assessment in the estimation of the Conditional Average Treatment Effect (CATE). Theoretical analysis of the finite sample regime and empirical studies show that PermuCATE has lower variance than the Leave-One-Covariate-Out (LOCO) method and provides a reliable measure of variable importance. This property increases statistical power, which is crucial for causal inference applications with finite sample sizes. We empirically demonstrate the benefits of PermuCATE in simulated and real datasets, including complex settings with high-dimensional, correlated variables. Joseph Paillard, Angel David Reyero Lobo, Vitaliy Kolodyazhniy, Bertrand Thirion, Denis A. Engemann |
ICML | 2 |