Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Artem Matveev
dblp:412/8430
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0004-0271-221XORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Recommender systems · 75% Information retrieval · 25% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
attention mechanism |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Gated Bidirectional Linear Attention for Generative Retrieval · SIGIR 2026 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › attention mechanism › efficient attention
linear attention |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Gated Bidirectional Linear Attention for Generative Retrieval · SIGIR 2026 |
Information retrieval › retrieval models
generative retrieval |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Gated Bidirectional Linear Attention for Generative Retrieval · SIGIR 2026 |
Recommender systems
neural recommendation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Scaling Recommender Transformers to One Billion Parameters · KDD (1) 2026 |
Recommender systems
sequential recommendation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Gated Bidirectional Linear Attention for Generative Retrieval · SIGIR 2026 |
Recommender systems › sequential recommendation
transformer-based recommendation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Scaling Recommender Transformers to One Billion Parameters · KDD (1) 2026 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › scaling laws
transformer scaling |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Scaling Recommender Transformers to One Billion Parameters · KDD (1) 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sequential transduction · 2.0kernelized linear attention · 2.0generative recommender framework · 2.0gated bidirectional linear attention · 2.0flashattention · 2.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Scaling Recommender Transformers to One Billion ParametersabstractWhile large transformer models have been successfully used in many real-world applications such as natural language processing, computer vision, and speech processing, scaling transformers for recommender systems remains a challenging problem. Recently, the Generative Recommenders framework was proposed as a way to scale beyond typical Deep Learning Recommendation Models (DLRMs). By reformulating recommendation as a sequential transduction task, it improves scaling properties in terms of compute. Nevertheless, the largest encoder configuration reported by the HSTU authors is only 176 million parameters --- far smaller than the hundreds of billions (or even trillions) that are now common in language models. Kirill Khrylchenko, Artem Matveev, Sergei S. Makeev, Vladimir Baikalov |
KDD (1) | 2 |
| 2026 | Gated Bidirectional Linear Attention for Generative RetrievalabstractIn recommender systems, generative retrieval typically uses an encoder–decoder setup: an encoder processes a user interaction history, and an autoregressive decoder then generates recommended items. In large-scale streaming services, active users accumulate very long histories over time. As histories grow, the encoder becomes a major latency bottleneck because softmax attention scales quadratically with sequence length. In our experiments, using bidirectional attention in the encoder substantially improves quality. However, most sub-quadratic attention methods focus on causal attention. We propose Gated Bidirectional Linear Attention (GBLA), a linear-time bidirectional attention layer that extends kernelized linear attention with three lightweight components: local causal mixing (Conv1D), sequence-level key gating for soft forgetting, and a gated RMSNorm output. On a large-scale Yandex Music dataset, a hybrid encoder that interleaves self-attention (SA) and GBLA in a 1:2 ratio (one SA block followed by two GBLA blocks) matches bidirectional self-attention quality. On H100 GPUs, GBLA reaches up to an \(8.2\times\) single-layer speedup at a history length of 32768, compared to FlashAttention-v3. Finally, we show that the same hybrid design generalizes beyond our proprietary setting, consistently preserving self-attention retrieval quality on public Amazon benchmarks. Artem Matveev, Vladislav Tytskiy, Sergei S. Makeev, Sergei Liamaev |
SIGIR | 1 |
| 2025 | Correcting the LogQ Correction: Revisiting Sampled Softmax for Large-Scale RetrievalabstractTwo-tower neural networks are a popular architecture for the retrieval stage in recommender systems. These models are typically trained with a softmax loss over the item catalog. However, in web-scale settings, the item catalog is often prohibitively large, making full softmax infeasible. A common solution is sampled softmax, which approximates the full softmax using a small number of sampled negatives. One practical and widely adopted approach is to use in-batch negatives, where negatives are drawn from items in the current mini-batch. However, this introduces a bias: items that appear more frequently in the batch (i.e., popular items) are penalized more heavily. To mitigate this issue, a popular industry technique known as logQ correction adjusts the logits during training by subtracting the log-probability of an item appearing in the batch. This correction is derived by analyzing the bias in the gradient and applying importance sampling, effectively twice, using the in-batch distribution as a proposal distribution. While this approach improves model quality, it does not fully eliminate the bias. In this work, we revisit the derivation of logQ correction and show that it overlooks a subtle but important detail: the positive item in the denominator is not Monte Carlo-sampled - it is always present with probability 1. We propose a refined correction formula that accounts for this. Notably, our loss introduces an interpretable sample weight that reflects the model's uncertainty - the probability of misclassification under the current parameters. We evaluate our method on both public and proprietary datasets, demonstrating consistent improvements over the standard logQ correction. Kirill Khrylchenko, Vladimir Baikalov, Sergei S. Makeev, Artem Matveev, Sergei Liamaev |
RecSys | 4 |