Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Runshi Yang

dblp:413/1752 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 67% Optimization for machine learning · 33%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.912025
Better Training Data Attribution via Better Inverse Hessian-Vector Products · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
training data attribution
0.912025
Better Training Data Attribution via Better Inverse Hessian-Vector Products · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

neumann series iteration · 0.9EKFAC preconditioner · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Better Training Data Attribution via Better Inverse Hessian-Vector Products
abstract
Training data attribution (TDA) provides insights into which training data is responsible for a learned model behavior. Gradient-based TDA methods such as influence functions and unrolled differentiation both involve a computation that resembles an inverse Hessian-vector product (iHVP), which is difficult to approximate efficiently. We introduce an algorithm (ASTRA) which uses the EKFAC-preconditioner on Neumann series iterations to arrive at an accurate iHVP approximation for TDA. ASTRA is easy to tune, requires fewer iterations than Neumann series iterations, and is more accurate than EKFAC-based approximations. Using ASTRA, we show that improving the accuracy of the iHVP approximation can significantly improve TDA performance.
Elisa Nguyen, Runshi Yang, Juhan Bae, Sheila A. McIlraith, Roger B. Grosse
NeurIPS3