Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sumegba Garg
dblp:413/4909
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Computational complexity · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
machine unlearning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | The Space Complexity of Learning-Unlearning Algorithms (extended abstract) · COLT 2025 |
Computational complexity
memory complexity |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | The Space Complexity of Learning-Unlearning Algorithms (extended abstract) · COLT 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
star number · 1.7eluder dimension · 1.7VC dimension · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | The Space Complexity of Learning-Unlearning Algorithms (extended abstract)abstractWe study the memory complexity of machine unlearning algorithms that provide strong data deletion guarantees to the users. Formally, consider an algorithm for a particular learning task that initially receives a training dataset. Then, after learning, it receives data deletion requests from a subset of users (of arbitrary size), and the goal of unlearning is to perform the task as if the learner never received the data of deleted users. In this paper, we ask how many bits of storage are needed to be able to complete certain training samples, at a later time. We focus on the task of realizability testing, where the goal is to check whether the remaining training samples are realizable within a given hypothesis class $\mathcal{H}$. Toward that end, we first provide a negative result showing that the VC dimension, a well-known combinatorial property of $\mathcal{H}$ that characterizes the amount of information needed for learning and representing the ERM hypothesis in the standard PAC learning task—is not a characterization of the space complexity of unlearning. In particular, we provide a hypothesis class with constant VC dimension (and Littlestone dimension), but for which any unlearning algorithm for realizability testing needs to store $\Omega(n)$ bits, where $n$ denotes the size of the initial training dataset. In fact, we provide a stronger separation by showing that for any hypothesis class $\mathcal{H}$, the amount of information that the learner needs to store, so as to perform unlearning later, is lower bounded by the Eluder dimension of $\mathcal{H}$, a combinatorial notion always larger than the VC dimension. We complement the lower bound with an upper bound in terms of the star number of the underlying hypothesis class, albeit in a stronger ticketed memory model proposed by Ghoroi et al. (2023). We show that for any class $\mathcal{H}$ with bounded star number, there exists a ticketed scheme that uses only $\tilde{O}(\text{StarNo}(\mathcal{H}))$ many bits of storage and these many tickets. Since, the star number for a hypothesis class is never larger than its Eluder dimension, our work highlights a fundamental separation between central and ticketed memory models for machine unlearning. Lastly, we consider the setting where the number of deletions is bounded and show that in contrast to the unbounded setting, there exist unlearning schemes with sublinear (in $n$) storage for hypothesis classes with bounded hollow star number, a notion of complexity that is always smaller than the star number and the Eluder dimension. Yeshwanth Cherapanamjeri, Sumegba Garg, Nived Rajaraman, Ayush Sekhari, Abhishek Shetty |
COLT | 2 |