Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jolene Huey

dblp:413/6126 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Transaction processing and concurrency control · 50% Distributed and cloud data management · 50%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Cloud and datacenter computing · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed and cloud data management › cloud database
multi-tenant database
0.912025
Fair Transaction Processing For Multi-Tenant Databases · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025
Transaction processing and concurrency control
transaction scheduling
0.912025
Fair Transaction Processing For Multi-Tenant Databases · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025
Cloud and datacenter computing
resource management
0.312025
Fair Transaction Processing For Multi-Tenant Databases · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

strategy-proof scheduling · 1.7fair sharing · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Fair Transaction Processing For Multi-Tenant Databases
abstract
Multi-tenant transactional databases frequently observe contention on shared data, leading to a need for performance isolation. Databases typically provide performance isolation via a request rate limit or quota per tenant, but this approach can lead to system underutilization. Traditionally, fair sharing has been applied to achieve both performance isolation and high utilization in other domains. In this paper, we address the problem of fair sharing for transactions, which introduces new challenges because client requests do not acquire resources all at once. We propose DRFT, the first fair transaction scheduling algorithm that ensures both the share guarantee and strategy-proofness by accurately accounting for transactional resource usage. We evaluate DRFT on a range of standard benchmarks and real-world workloads, showing that it ensures fairness with less than a 5% throughput overhead compared to state-of-the-art scheduling policies.
Audrey Cheng, Aaron N. Kabcenell, Jolene Huey, Peter Bailis, Natacha Crooks, Ion Stoica
Proc. VLDB Endow.4