Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Luodan Zhang

dblp:413/7551 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
in-context learning
0.912025
Learning to Rank for In-Context Example Retrieval · NeurIPS 2025
Information retrieval › ranking
learning to rank
0.912025
Learning to Rank for In-Context Example Retrieval · NeurIPS 2025
Information retrieval
case-based retrieval
0.312025
Learning to Rank for In-Context Example Retrieval · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

retrieval model training · 1.7preference optimization · 1.7learning to rank · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Learning to Rank for In-Context Example Retrieval
abstract
Recent advances in retrieval-based in-context learning (ICL) train the retriever using a classification objective, which categorizes in-context examples (ICEs) into the most useful and the rest based on absolute scores. However, during inference, ICEs are retrieved by score ranking rather than classification — The classification training objective deviates from this test scenario. Hence, in this paper, we propose a novel algorithm that trains a retrieval model by ranking formulation, where the preference rankings between ICEs are given by comparing the likelihood of the LLM generating the correct answer conditioned on each exemplar. By learning to rank, we motivate the retriever to automatically learn diverse rationales why specific examples are more useful for ICL decisions. This addresses the issue that classification models poorly capture broader utility. Experimental results demonstrate the top-1 performance of our proposal across 9 NLP tasks, with ablation studies and case studies further validating the effectiveness of our design. *The code can be found in: https://github.com/2022neo/SeDPO_NIPS25*
Yuwen Ji, Luodan Zhang, Ambyer Han, Haoran Que
NeurIPS2