Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ponhvoan Srey
dblp:414/6932
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-4780-2946ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 49% Language models and text generation · 46% Representation and self-supervised learning · 5% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
hallucination detection |
1.9 | 2 | 2026 | Learning Uncertainty from Sequential Internal Dispersion in Large Language Models · ACL (1) 2026 Unsupervised Hallucination Detection by Inspecting Reasoning Processes · EMNLP 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
large language model uncertainty |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Learning Uncertainty from Sequential Internal Dispersion in Large Language Models · ACL (1) 2026 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Learning Uncertainty from Sequential Internal Dispersion in Large Language Models · ACL (1) 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Unsupervised Hallucination Detection by Inspecting Reasoning Processes · EMNLP 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
representation probing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Unsupervised Hallucination Detection by Inspecting Reasoning Processes · EMNLP 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › latent representation
hidden state representation |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Learning Uncertainty from Sequential Internal Dispersion in Large Language Models · ACL (1) 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variance-based feature aggregation · 1.0supervised learning · 1.0uncertainty estimation · 0.9pseudo-labeling · 0.9contextualized embeddings · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Learning Uncertainty from Sequential Internal Dispersion in Large Language ModelsabstractUncertainty estimation is a promising approach to detect hallucinations in large language models (LLMs).Recent approaches commonly depend on model internal states to estimate uncertainty.However, they suffer from strict assumptions on how hidden states should evolve across layers, and from information loss by solely focusing on last or mean tokens.To address these issues, we present Sequential Internal Variance Representation (SIVR), a supervised hallucination detection framework that leverages token-wise, layer-wise features derived from hidden states.SIVR adopts a more basic assumption that uncertainty manifests in the degree of dispersion or variance of internal representations across layers, rather than relying on specific assumptions, which makes the method model and task agnostic.It additionally aggregates the full sequence of per-token variance features, learning temporal patterns indicative of factual errors and thereby preventing information loss.Experimental results demonstrate SIVR consistently outperforms strong baselines.Most importantly, SIVR enjoys stronger generalisation and avoids relying on large training sets, highlighting the potential for practical deployment. Ponhvoan Srey, Xiaobao Wu, Cong-Duy Nguyen, Anh Tuan Luu |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2025 | Unsupervised Hallucination Detection by Inspecting Reasoning ProcessesabstractUnsupervised hallucination detection aims to identify hallucinated content generated by large language models (LLMs) without relying on labeled data.While unsupervised methods have gained popularity by eliminating laborintensive human annotations, they frequently rely on proxy signals unrelated to factual correctness.This misalignment biases detection probes toward superficial or non-truthrelated aspects, limiting generalizability across datasets and scenarios.To overcome these limitations, we propose IRIS, an unsupervised hallucination detection framework, leveraging internal representations intrinsic to factual correctness.IRIS prompts the LLM to carefully verify the truthfulness of a given statement, and obtain its contextualized embedding as informative features for training.Meanwhile, the uncertainty of each response is considered a soft pseudolabel for truthfulness.Experimental results demonstrate that IRIS consistently outperforms existing unsupervised methods.Our approach is fully unsupervised, computationally low cost, and works well even with few training data, making it suitable for real-time detection.1 Ponhvoan Srey, Xiaobao Wu, Anh Tuan Luu |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2025 | Uncover and unlearn nuisances: agnostic fully test-time adaptation
Ponhvoan Srey, Yaxin Shi, Hangwei Qian, Jing Li 0009, Ivor W. Tsang |
Mach. Learn. | 1 |