Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Aditya Nagachandra
dblp:414/7726
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 44% Video understanding and tracking · 44% 3D vision · 13% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › temporal reasoning
spatio-temporal reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | VLM4D: Towards Spatiotemporal Awareness in Vision Language Models · ICCV 2025 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › temporal modeling
temporal consistency |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | VLM4D: Towards Spatiotemporal Awareness in Vision Language Models · ICCV 2025 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d scene reconstruction
dynamic scene reconstruction |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | VLM4D: Towards Spatiotemporal Awareness in Vision Language Models · ICCV 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
supervised fine-tuning · 0.94d feature field reconstruction · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | VLM4D: Towards Spatiotemporal Awareness in Vision Language ModelsabstractVision language models (VLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in integrating linguistic and visual reasoning but remain fundamentally limited in understanding dynamic spatiotemporal interactions. Humans effortlessly track and reason about object movements, rotations, and perspective shifts-abilities essential for robust dynamic real-world understanding yet notably lacking in current VLMs. In this paper, we introduce VLM4D, the first benchmark specifically designed to evaluate the spatiotemporal reasoning capabilities of VLMs. Our benchmark comprises diverse real-world and synthetic videos accompanied by carefully curated question-answer pairs emphasizing translational and rotational motions, perspective awareness, and motion continuity. Through comprehensive evaluations of state-of-the-art open and closed-source VLMs, we identify significant performance gaps compared to human baselines, highlighting fundamental deficiencies in existing models. Extensive analysis reveals that VLMs struggle particularly with integrating multiple visual cues and maintaining temporal coherence. We further explore promising directions, such as leveraging 4D feature field reconstruction and targeted spatiotemporal supervised fine-tuning, demonstrating their effectiveness in enhancing spatiotemporal comprehension. Our work aims to encourage deeper exploration into improving VLMs' spatial and temporal grounding, paving the way towards more capable and reliable visual intelligence for dynamic environments. Shijie Zhou 0003, Alexander Vilesov, Xuehai He, Ziyu Wan, Shuwang Zhang, Aditya Nagachandra, Di Chang, Xin Wang 0061, Achuta Kadambi |
ICCV | 6 |