Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
WingYin Yu
dblp:414/9995
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization › optimization modeling
LLM-based optimization modeling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | A Survey of Optimization Modeling Meets LLMs: Progress and Future Directions · IJCAI 2025 |
Mathematical optimization
optimization modeling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | A Survey of Optimization Modeling Meets LLMs: Progress and Future Directions · IJCAI 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
large language model · 0.9fine-tuning · 0.9data synthesis · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | A Survey of Optimization Modeling Meets LLMs: Progress and Future DirectionsabstractBy virtue of its great utility in solving real-world problems, optimization modeling has been widely employed for optimal decision-making across various sectors, but it requires substantial expertise from operations research professionals. With the advent of large language models (LLMs), new opportunities have emerged to automate the procedure of mathematical modeling. This survey presents a comprehensive and timely review of recent advancements that cover the entire technical stack, including data synthesis and fine-tuning for the base model, inference frameworks, benchmark datasets, and performance evaluation. In addition, we conducted an in-depth analysis on the quality of benchmark datasets, which was found to have a surprisingly high error rate. We cleaned the datasets and constructed a new leaderboard with fair performance evaluation in terms of base LLM model and datasets. We also build an online portal that integrates resources of cleaned datasets, code and paper repository to benefit the community. Finally, we identify limitations in current methodologies and outline future research opportunities. Ziyang Xiao, Jingrong Xie 0001, Lilin Xu, Shisi Guan, Jingyan Zhu, Xiongwei Han, Xiaojin Fu, WingYin Yu, Han Wu 0004, Qingcan Kang, Jiahui Duan, Tao Zhong 0004, Mingxuan Yuan, Yuan Wang 0003, Gang Chen 0001, Dongxiang Zhang |
IJCAI | 8 |