Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

WingYin Yu

dblp:414/9995 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization › optimization modeling
LLM-based optimization modeling
0.912025
A Survey of Optimization Modeling Meets LLMs: Progress and Future Directions · IJCAI 2025
Mathematical optimization
optimization modeling
0.912025
A Survey of Optimization Modeling Meets LLMs: Progress and Future Directions · IJCAI 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large language model · 0.9fine-tuning · 0.9data synthesis · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 A Survey of Optimization Modeling Meets LLMs: Progress and Future Directions
abstract
By virtue of its great utility in solving real-world problems, optimization modeling has been widely employed for optimal decision-making across various sectors, but it requires substantial expertise from operations research professionals. With the advent of large language models (LLMs), new opportunities have emerged to automate the procedure of mathematical modeling. This survey presents a comprehensive and timely review of recent advancements that cover the entire technical stack, including data synthesis and fine-tuning for the base model, inference frameworks, benchmark datasets, and performance evaluation. In addition, we conducted an in-depth analysis on the quality of benchmark datasets, which was found to have a surprisingly high error rate. We cleaned the datasets and constructed a new leaderboard with fair performance evaluation in terms of base LLM model and datasets. We also build an online portal that integrates resources of cleaned datasets, code and paper repository to benefit the community. Finally, we identify limitations in current methodologies and outline future research opportunities.
Ziyang Xiao, Jingrong Xie 0001, Lilin Xu, Shisi Guan, Jingyan Zhu, Xiongwei Han, Xiaojin Fu, WingYin Yu, Han Wu 0004, Qingcan Kang, Jiahui Duan, Tao Zhong 0004, Mingxuan Yuan, Yuan Wang 0003, Gang Chen 0001, Dongxiang Zhang
IJCAI8