Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Fritz Rauschenbach
dblp:415/1577
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data models and query languages · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
argumentation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Grounding Rule-Based Argumentation Using Datalog · KR 2025 |
Data models and query languages
datalog |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Grounding Rule-Based Argumentation Using Datalog · KR 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › logic-based reasoning
first-order logic |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Grounding Rule-Based Argumentation Using Datalog · KR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
grounding · 1.7datalog engine · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Grounding Rule-Based Argumentation Using DatalogabstractASPIC+ is one of the main general frameworks for rule-based argumentation for AI. Although first-order rules are commonly used in ASPIC+ examples, most existing approaches to reason over rule-based argumentation only support propositional rules. To enable reasoning over first-order instances, a preliminary grounding step is required. As groundings can lead to an exponential increase in the size of the input theories, intelligent procedures are needed. However, there is a lack of dedicated solutions for ASPIC+. Therefore, we propose an intelligent grounding procedure that keeps the size of the grounding manageable while preserving the correctness of the reasoning process. To this end, we translate the first-order ASPIC+ instance into a Datalog program and query a Datalog engine to obtain ground substitutions to perform the grounding of rules and contraries. Additionally, we propose simplifications specific to the ASPIC+ formalism to avoid grounding of rules that have no influence on the reasoning process. Finally, we performed an empirical evaluation of a prototypical implementation to show scalability. Martin Diller, Sarah Alice Gaggl, Philipp Hanisch, Giuseppina Monterosso, Fritz Rauschenbach |
KR | 5 |