Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tse-Sheng Nan
dblp:415/3186
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Reinforcement learning · 67% Motion planning and robot control · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › safe reinforcement learning
constrained policy learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Action-Constrained Imitation Learning · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
imitation learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Action-Constrained Imitation Learning · ICML 2025 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Action-Constrained Imitation Learning · ICML 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
trajectory alignment · 0.9model predictive control · 0.9dynamic time warping · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Action-Constrained Imitation LearningabstractPolicy learning under action constraints plays a central role in ensuring safe behaviors in various robot control and resource allocation applications.
In this paper, we study a new problem setting termed Action-Constrained Imitation Learning (ACIL), where an action-constrained imitator aims to learn from a demonstrative expert with larger action space.
The fundamental challenge of ACIL lies in the unavoidable mismatch of occupancy measure between the expert and the imitator caused by the action constraints. We tackle this mismatch through trajectory alignment and propose DTWIL, which replaces the original expert demonstrations with a surrogate dataset that follows similar state trajectories while adhering to the action constraints. Specifically, we recast trajectory alignment as a planning problem and solve it via Model Predictive Control, which aligns the surrogate trajectories with the expert trajectories based on the Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) distance. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate that learning from the dataset generated by DTWIL significantly enhances performance across multiple robot control tasks and outperforms various benchmark imitation learning algorithms in terms of sample efficiency. Chia-Han Yeh, Tse-Sheng Nan, Risto Vuorio, Wei Hung, Hung-Yen Wu, Shao-Hua Sun, Ping-Chun Hsieh |
ICML | 2 |