EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ruiheng Yu
dblp:415/4330
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Human-AI interaction · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Interpretable and Interactive Deep Survival Analysis with Time-dependent EXtreme Gradient Integration · ICDM 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
survival analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Interpretable and Interactive Deep Survival Analysis with Time-dependent EXtreme Gradient Integration · ICDM 2025 |
Human-AI interaction
interactive machine learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Interpretable and Interactive Deep Survival Analysis with Time-dependent EXtreme Gradient Integration · ICDM 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
gradient boosting · 2.6discrete-time survival analysis · 2.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Interpretable and Interactive Deep Survival Analysis with Time-dependent EXtreme Gradient IntegrationabstractAccurate prediction of time-to-event outcomes, commonly known as survival analysis, is vital in high-stakes domains such as healthcare and business, where timely and trustworthy insights can have profound implications. Traditional survival analysis methods either provide predictions without clear explanations or offer interpretability without a mechanism to integrate expert insights. In many real-world scenarios, decision-makers require models that are both transparent and capable of interactively incorporating domain knowledge to refine predictions. The key challenge we address is how to simultaneously achieve accurate time-to-event forecasting, clear interpretability, and interactive integration of expert feedback. We propose the Interpretable and Interactive Deep Discrete-Time Survival Analysis framework, an approach that is both data-driven and knowledge-driven. Furthermore, it embeds expert knowledge into the model, dynamically aligns feature contributions with evolving risk patterns, and actively engages experts to guide the learning process interactively. This interactive strategy not only enhances predictive performance but also produces explanations that clearly reflect the critical factors identified by domain experts. Extensive evaluations on diverse clinical and business datasets demonstrate that our method captures feature importance and yields robust and reliable predictions that stand in contrast to conventional black-box models. These results indicate that bridging interpretability with interactive expert engagement can significantly improve decision support systems. By integrating accurate forecasting with human-aligned, interactive explanations, our framework offers a promising direction for developing more transparent and trusted models across a wide range of disciplines. Xinyu Qin, Ruiheng Yu, Armin Khayati, Zixiao Qiu, Gengyi Zou |
ICDM | 2 |