Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Dmitry Kobyzev

dblp:415/4622 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 50% Language models and text generation · 50%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
entity discovery
1.012026
LLM-Based Agent for Competitive Landscape Mapping in Drug Asset Due Diligence · AAAI 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
LLM agents
1.012026
LLM-Based Agent for Competitive Landscape Mapping in Drug Asset Due Diligence · AAAI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

retrieval agent · 2.0large language model · 2.0LLM-as-a-judge · 2.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 LLM-Based Agent for Competitive Landscape Mapping in Drug Asset Due Diligence
abstract
In this paper, we describe and benchmark a competitor-discovery component used within an agentic AI system for fast drug asset due diligence. A competitor-discovery AI agent, given an indication, retrieves all drugs comprising the competitive landscape of that indication and extracts canonical attributes for these drugs. The competitor definition is investor-specific, and data is paywalled/licensed, fragmented across registries, ontology-mismatched by indication, alias-heavy for drug names, multimodal, and rapidly changing. Although considered the best tool for this problem, the current LLM-based AI systems aren’t capable of reliably retrieving all competing drug names, and there is no accepted public benchmark for this task. To address the lack of evaluation, we use LLM-based agents to transform five years of multimodal, unstructured diligence memos from a private biotech VC fund into a structured evaluation corpus mapping indications to competitor drugs with normalized attributes. We also introduce a competitor validating LLM-as-a-judge agent that filters out false positives from the list of predicted competitors to maximize precision and suppress hallucinations. In this benchmark, our competitor discovery agent (Bioptic Agent) achieves 83% recall, exceeding OpenAI Deep Research (65%) and Perplexity Labs (60%). The system is deployed in production with enterprise users; in a case study with a biotech VC investment fund, analyst turnaround time dropped from 2.5 days to ~3 hours (~20x) for the competitive analysis.
Vlad Vinogradov, Alisa Vinogradova, Dmitrii Radkevich, Ilya Yasny, Dmitry Kobyzev, Ivan Izmailov, Katsiaryna Yanchanka, Andrey Doronichev
AAAI5