EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shmuel Goldklang
dblp:415/4925
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Multi-agent systems · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
distributed constraint optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Privacy Preserving Solution of DCOPs by Local Search · IJCAI 2025 |
Mathematical optimization › combinatorial optimization
local search |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Privacy Preserving Solution of DCOPs by Local Search · IJCAI 2025 |
Privacy and data protection › privacy-preserving computation › privacy-preserving distributed computation
privacy-preserving distributed optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Privacy Preserving Solution of DCOPs by Local Search · IJCAI 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
p-max-sum · 2.6local search · 2.6DSA · 2.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Privacy Preserving Solution of DCOPs by Local SearchabstractOne of the main reasons for solving constraint optimization problems in a distributed manner is maintaining agents’ privacy. Several studies in the past decade devised privacy-preserving versions of Distributed Constraint Optimization Problem (DCOP) algorithms. Some of those algorithms were complete, i.e., finding an optimal solution, while others were incomplete. The main advantage of the incomplete approach is in its scalability to large problems. One of the important incomplete paradigms for solving DCOPs is local search. Yet, so far no privacy-preserving algorithm for solving DCOPs by means of local search was devised. We present P-DSA, a privacy-preserving implementation of the classical local-search algorithm DSA that preserves topology, constraint, and assignment/decision privacy. Comparing its performance to that of P-Max-Sum, which is another privacy-preserving implementation of an incomplete DCOP algorithm, shows that P-DSA is significantly more scalable and issues much better solutions than P-Max-Sum. Therefore, P-DSA emerges as a suitable solution for practitioners addressing large-scale DCOPs with privacy considerations. Shmuel Goldklang, Tal Grinshpoun, Tamir Tassa |
IJCAI | 1 |