Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shaoxuan Tang
dblp:416/0235
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0008-0977-7592ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Query processing and optimization · 87% Database system architecture and tuning · 13% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Query processing and optimization › materialization
late materialization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Selective Late Materialization in Modern Analytical Databases · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025 |
Query processing and optimization › materialization
selective materialization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Selective Late Materialization in Modern Analytical Databases · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
cost-based materialization · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Selective Late Materialization in Modern Analytical DatabasesabstractLate Materialization (LM) is a critical technique applied in traditional column stores to speed up analytical queries. However, with modern analytical databases evolved to incorporate a vectorized columnar execution engine, LM's benefits in I/O reduction and fast columnar query processing have diminished. In this paper, we redefine the concept of Late Materialization in the context of modern analytical databases and propose Selective Late Materialization (SLM) to allow each attribute in a query to choose its own materialization point that yields the minimum cost. SLM expands the solution space of the traditional materialization problem from one unified hard-coded binary decision (i.e., early or late) for all attributes to per attribute per query decisions. By integrating SLM into DuckDB, we show that SLM consistently outperforms the baselines of Early Materialization and Late Materialization by 14.7% and 8.9%, respectively, on average using the Join Order Benchmark (JOB), with up to 76.7% latency reduction for individual queries. We observe similar results for the TPC-DS benchmark. Yihao Liu 0008, Shaoxuan Tang, Yulong Hui, Hangrui Zhou, Huanchen Zhang |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 2 |