Florian Mehrkens

dblp:416/5403 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Motion planning and robot control · 50% Robot manipulation · 50%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-robot interaction · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
impedance control
0.912025
Back to the Cartesian: Pilot Study for Assessing Human Stiffness in 3D Cartesian Space by Transforming from Muscle Space in a Peg-In-Hole Scenario for Tele-Impedance · ICRA 2025
Robotics › Robot manipulation › parameter identification
stiffness estimation
0.912025
Back to the Cartesian: Pilot Study for Assessing Human Stiffness in 3D Cartesian Space by Transforming from Muscle Space in a Peg-In-Hole Scenario for Tele-Impedance · ICRA 2025
Human-robot interaction
teleoperation
0.912025
Back to the Cartesian: Pilot Study for Assessing Human Stiffness in 3D Cartesian Space by Transforming from Muscle Space in a Peg-In-Hole Scenario for Tele-Impedance · ICRA 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

electromyography · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Back to the Cartesian: Pilot Study for Assessing Human Stiffness in 3D Cartesian Space by Transforming from Muscle Space in a Peg-In-Hole Scenario for Tele-Impedance
abstract
For various teleoperation tasks, position-based control is not practical. An impedance-based control is superior e.g. for handling fragile objects, like harvesting fruits or grasping a paper cup. However, only a few researchers have focused on impedance control for teleoperation. In tele-impedance, the stiffness of a human is measured and transferred to a controller of a robot. Until now, human stiffness was mostly measured either for specific joints or in 2D Cartesian space. We introduce a new way of measuring Cartesian stiffness in 3D using electromyography. Users were asked to perform a peg-in-hole task in three different orientations (0°, 45°, 90°). Meanwhile, electromyography measurements at shoulder and elbow muscle groups are performed. In a proof-of-concept study, we showed that the measured stiffness matrix in Cartesian space differed significantly across the three differently oriented peg-in-hole scenarios. This demonstrates that human stiffness could be predicted in 3D Cartesian space based on the type of task at hand.
Sabine Thürauf, Florian Mehrkens, Claudio Castellini, Marek Sierotowicz
ICRA2