EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Dhruv Ahuja
dblp:416/6724
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-4502-5717ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Motion planning and robot control · 88% Robot navigation and mapping · 12% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › path planning
local path planning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Dynamic Gap: Safe Gap-based Navigation in Dynamic Environments · ICRA 2025 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
motion planning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Dynamic Gap: Safe Gap-based Navigation in Dynamic Environments · ICRA 2025 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
collision avoidance |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Dynamic Gap: Safe Gap-based Navigation in Dynamic Environments · ICRA 2025 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
dynamic environments |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Dynamic Gap: Safe Gap-based Navigation in Dynamic Environments · ICRA 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
simulation benchmarking · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Dynamic Gap: Safe Gap-based Navigation in Dynamic EnvironmentsabstractThis paper extends the family of gap-based local planners to unknown dynamic environments through generating provably collision-free properties for hierarchical navigation systems. Existing perception-informed local planners that operate in dynamic environments rely on emergent or empirical robustness for collision avoidance as opposed to performing formal analysis of dynamic obstacles. In addition to this, the obstacle tracking that is performed in these existent planners is often achieved with respect to a global inertial frame, subjecting such tracking estimates to transformation errors from odometry drift. The proposed local planner, dynamic gap, shifts the tracking paradigm to modeling how the free space, represented as gaps, evolves over time. Gap crossing and closing conditions are developed to aid in determining the feasibility of passage through gaps, and a breadth of simulation benchmarking is performed against other navigation planners in the literature where the proposed dynamic gap planner achieves the highest success rate out of all planners tested in all environments. Max Asselmeier, Dhruv Ahuja, Abdel Zaro, Ahmad Abuaish, Ye Zhao 0002, Patricio A. Vela |
ICRA | 2 |