Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ranzhe Deng

dblp:417/0085 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0005-5631-7415ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Storage systems · 50% Memory systems · 50%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Storage systems › data reduction
data deduplication
0.912025
SampDedup: Sampling Prediction for Efficient Inline Data Deduplication on Non-volatile Memory · ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. 2025
Storage systems › data reduction › data deduplication
inline deduplication
0.912025
SampDedup: Sampling Prediction for Efficient Inline Data Deduplication on Non-volatile Memory · ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. 2025
Memory systems
non-volatile memory
0.912025
SampDedup: Sampling Prediction for Efficient Inline Data Deduplication on Non-volatile Memory · ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. 2025
Memory systems › non-volatile memory
NVRAM
0.912025
SampDedup: Sampling Prediction for Efficient Inline Data Deduplication on Non-volatile Memory · ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sampling prediction · 0.9asynchronous fingerprinting · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 SampDedup: Sampling Prediction for Efficient Inline Data Deduplication on Non-volatile Memory
abstract
Data deduplication is an effective technique for reducing redundant data storage space in various storage systems. Generally, deduplication consists of four steps: chunking, fingerprinting, fingerprint lookup, and data management. Recently, Non-volatile Memory (NVM) as an emerging storage device has received widespread attention. Directly applying the deduplication technique on NVM for storage cost savings faces many challenges: (a) deduplication on NVM devices suffers from computation bottleneck instead of the I/O bottleneck faced by deduplication on traditional storage devices (such as HDD and SSD); (b) new fingerprint indexes and metadata are required to be re-designed to adapt to NVM characteristics; (c) inline deduplication on NVM is more sensitive to the latency. To solve these challenges, we propose a novel Samp ling prediction-based inline data Dedup lication method ( SampDedup ) on NVM devices. It aims to ensure high deduplication ratios while reducing computation costs and latency by optimizing data chunking , fingerprinting , and fingerprint lookup . (a) For data chunking , a sampling prediction-based chunking method ( SampChunk ) is proposed to leverage chunk similarity to distinguish duplicate chunks and skip them for chunking. This method can be easily integrated into most sliding-window based and non-window based CDC chunking algorithms. (b) For fingerprinting , the commonly used SHA-1 algorithm is further optimized to reduce the extra computational overhead introduced by SampChunk, and an asynchronous fingerprinting method is proposed to reduce the fingerprinting latency of unique chunks. (c) For fingerprint lookup , we design a header fingerprint index and metadata table for each data chunk constructed by SampChunk on NVM, and we use a fast-read buffer to replace the traditional slow LRU cache to improve search efficiency. Experiments on four real-world datasets demonstrate that SampDedup consistently presents high inline data deduplication ratios on NVM with different workloads and data partitioning algorithms while saving more than 90% chunking time compared with state-of-the-art deduplication baselines.
Ziyue Xu 0005, Ranzhe Deng, Liping Yi, Yusen Li, Gang Wang 0001, Xiaoguang Liu 0001
ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim.3