EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Doha Nam
dblp:417/5237
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0006-4195-2931ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Systems and software security · 67% Blockchain and cryptocurrency security · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Systems and software security › vulnerability discovery
vulnerability classification |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LOSVER: Line-Level Modifiability Signal-Guided Vulnerability Detection and Classification · ASE 2025 |
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security › smart contract security
vulnerability detection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LOSVER: Line-Level Modifiability Signal-Guided Vulnerability Detection and Classification · ASE 2025 |
Systems and software security
vulnerability discovery |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LOSVER: Line-Level Modifiability Signal-Guided Vulnerability Detection and Classification · ASE 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
pre-trained language model · 0.9line-level modifiability signal · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | LOSVER: Line-Level Modifiability Signal-Guided Vulnerability Detection and ClassificationabstractThe prevalence of software vulnerabilities necessitates accurate and scalable detection techniques. While Pre-trained Language Models (PLMs) have shown strong potential in vulnerability analysis, most existing methods provide no explicit guidance on which parts of the input code are more likely to be vulnerable. As a result, the model must infer token-level relevance without any indication of which parts are important, making it harder to learn the characteristics of vulnerable code during training. We address this by proposing LOSVER (Line-level mOdifiability Signal-guided VulnERability analyzer), a novel two-stage framework that enhances PLM-based vulnerability analysis using line-level modifiability signals. LOSVER first localizes modifiable lines, which are code segments likely to be changed in the future and often associated with vulnerabilities, and then assigns them greater importance, allowing the PLM to focus on potentially vulnerable regions during both training and inference. We evaluated LOSVER across three benchmark datasets (Devign, Big-Vul, and PrimeVul) for vulnerability detection, classification, and patch-pair analysis. Experimental results demonstrate that LOSVER consistently improves performance, increasing detection accuracy by 4 percentage points and the weighted F1-score for classification by over 2 points when applied on top of UniXcoder. These results demonstrate that integrating line-level modifiability signals significantly enhances the effectiveness of PLM-based software vulnerability analysis across both detection and classification tasks. Doha Nam, Jongmoon Baik |
ASE | 1 |