Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jiazhou Liang
dblp:417/6533
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0001-4278-8321ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Information retrieval · 64% Data mining · 36% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data mining
clustering |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Near-optimal Linear Predictive Clustering in Non-separable Spaces via MIP and QPBO Reductions · AAAI 2026 |
Mathematical optimization
discrete optimization |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Near-optimal Linear Predictive Clustering in Non-separable Spaces via MIP and QPBO Reductions · AAAI 2026 |
Mathematical optimization › integer programming › binary optimization
quadratic pseudo-boolean optimization |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Near-optimal Linear Predictive Clustering in Non-separable Spaces via MIP and QPBO Reductions · AAAI 2026 |
Information retrieval › document retrieval › passage retrieval
dense passage retrieval |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MA-DPR: Manifold-aware Distance Metrics for Dense Passage Retrieval · EMNLP 2025 |
Information retrieval
retrieval models |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MA-DPR: Manifold-aware Distance Metrics for Dense Passage Retrieval · EMNLP 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
quadratic pseudo-boolean optimization · 2.0greedy optimization · 2.0mixed-integer programming · 1.0mixed integer programming · 1.0shortest path · 0.9nearest neighbor graph · 0.9manifold learning · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Near-optimal Linear Predictive Clustering in Non-separable Spaces via MIP and QPBO ReductionsabstractLinear Predictive Clustering (LPC) partitions samples based on shared linear relationships between feature and target variables, with numerous applications including marketing, medicine, and education. Greedy optimization methods, commonly used for LPC, alternate between clustering and linear regression but lack global optimality. While effective for separable clusters, they struggle in non-separable settings where clusters overlap in feature space. In an alternative constrained optimization paradigm, previous works formulated LPC as a Mixed-Integer Program (MIP), ensuring global optimality regardless of separability but at the cost of poor scalability. This work builds on the constrained optimization paradigm to introduce two novel approaches that improve the efficiency of global optimization for LPC. By leveraging key theoretical properties of separability, we derive near-optimal approximations with provable error bounds, significantly reducing the MIP formulation’s complexity and improving scalability. Additionally, we can further approximate LPC as a Quadratic Pseudo-Boolean Optimization (QPBO) problem, achieving additional computational gains in the special case of two clusters. Comparative analyses on synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate that our methods consistently achieve near-optimal solutions with substantially lower regression errors than greedy optimization while exhibiting superior scalability over existing MIP formulations. Jiazhou Liang, Hassan Khurram, Scott Sanner |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2026 | VOGUE: A Multimodal Dataset for Conversational Recommendation in FashionabstractMultimodal conversational recommendation has recently emerged as a promising paradigm for delivering personalized experiences through natural dialogue enriched by visual and contextual grounding. Yet, currently available multimodal conversational recommendation datasets remain limited: existing resources either simulate conversations, omit user history, or fail to collect sufficiently detailed feedback, all of which constrain the types of research and evaluation they support. David Guo, Minqi Sun, Yilun Jiang, Jiazhou Liang, Scott Sanner |
UMAP | 4 |
| 2025 | MA-DPR: Manifold-aware Distance Metrics for Dense Passage RetrievalabstractDense Passage Retrieval (DPR) typically relies on Euclidean or cosine distance to measure query-passage relevance in embedding space, which is effective when embeddings lie on a linear manifold.However, our experiments across DPR benchmarks suggest that embeddings often lie on lower-dimensional, non-linear manifolds, especially in out-of-distribution (OOD) settings, where cosine and Euclidean distance fail to capture semantic similarity.To address this limitation, we propose a manifold-aware distance metric for DPR (MA-DPR) that models the intrinsic manifold structure of passages using a nearest neighbor graph and measures query-passage distance based on their shortest path in this graph.We show that MA-DPR outperforms Euclidean and cosine distances by up to 26% on OOD passage retrieval with comparable in-distribution performance across various embedding models while incurring a minimal increase in query inference time.Empirical evidence suggests that manifold-aware distance allows DPR to leverage context from related neighboring passages, making it effective even in the absence of direct semantic overlap.MA-DPR can be applied to a wide range of dense embedding and retrieval tasks, offering potential benefits across a wide spectrum of domains. Qianfeng Wen, Mark Zhao, Jiazhou Liang, Scott Sanner |
EMNLP | 4 |