Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Gregory Jun
dblp:417/9502
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computing education · 77% Computational science and engineering · 23% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Toward Engineering AGI: Benchmarking the Engineering Design Capabilities of LLMs · NeurIPS 2025 |
Computing education › STEM education
engineering design education |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Toward Engineering AGI: Benchmarking the Engineering Design Capabilities of LLMs · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
simulation-based evaluation · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | TileFuse: Fused Mixed-Precision Kernels for Quantized LLM Inference on AMD XDNA2 NPUsabstractOn-device LLM inference increasingly relies on low-bit quantization, but practical formats such as W4A16 do not map cleanly to existing client NPU software stacks. We present TileFuse, a fused mixed-precision kernel library for AMD XDNA2 NPUs that directly consumes quantized weights, performs on-the-fly dequantization, and executes GEMM/GEMV without materializing BF16 weights in DRAM. TileFuse combines offline interleaved pre-tiling, optimized microkernels, and a memory-core-assisted 2D weight-distribution dataflow. Across Ryzen AI platforms, TileFuse achieves over 2× kernel-level gains and up to 1.9× faster prefilling with over 50% lower energy in end-to-end LLM inference in comparison with the iGPU baseline. Wesley Pang, Gregory Jun, Deming Chen |
FCCM | 2 |
| 2025 | Toward Engineering AGI: Benchmarking the Engineering Design Capabilities of LLMsabstractModern engineering, spanning electrical, mechanical, aerospace, civil, and computer disciplines, stands as a cornerstone of human civilization and the foundation of our society. However, engineering design poses a fundamentally different challenge for large language models (LLMs) compared with traditional textbook-style problem solving or factual question answering. Although existing benchmarks have driven progress in areas such as language understanding, code synthesis, and scientific problem solving, real-world engineering design demands the synthesis of domain knowledge, navigation of complex trade-offs, and management of the tedious processes that consume much of practicing engineers' time. Despite these shared challenges across engineering disciplines, no benchmark currently captures the unique demands of engineering design work. In this work, we introduce EngDesign, an Engineering Design benchmark that evaluates LLMs' abilities to perform practical design tasks across nine engineering domains. Unlike existing benchmarks that focus on factual recall or question answering, EngDesign uniquely emphasizes LLMs' ability to synthesize domain knowledge, reason under constraints, and generate functional, objective-oriented engineering designs. Each task in EngDesign represents a real-world engineering design problem, accompanied by a detailed task description specifying design goals, constraints, and performance requirements. EngDesign pioneers a simulation-based evaluation paradigm that moves beyond textbook knowledge to assess genuine engineering design capabilities and shifts evaluation from static answer checking to dynamic, simulation-driven functional verification, marking a crucial step toward realizing the vision of engineering Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). Xingang Guo, Xiangyi Kong, Yilan Jiang, Xiayu Zhao, Zhihua Gong, Daixuan Li, Tianle Sang, Beixiao Zhu, Gregory Jun, Yingbing Huang, Yuqi Xue, Rahul Dev Kundu, Qi Jian Lim, Luke Alexander Granger, Mohamed Badr Younis, Darioush Keivan, Nippun Sabharwal, Shreyanka Sinha, Prakhar Agarwal, Kojo Vandyck, Hanlin Mai, Aditya Venkatesh, Ayush Barik, Jiankun Yang, Chongying Yue, Jingjie He, Licheng Xu, Liujun Xu, Rushabh Shetty, Ziheng Guo, Dahui Song, Manvi Jha, Weijie Liang, Weiman Yan, Bryan Zhang, Sahil Bhandary Karnoor, Rutva Pandya, Xinyi Gong, Mithesh Ballae Ganesh, Feize Shi, Ruiling Xu, Yanfeng Ouyang, Lianhui Qin, Elyse Rosenbaum, Corey Snyder, Peter J. Seiler, Geir E. Dullerud, Xiaojia Shelly Zhang, Zuofu Cheng, Pavan Kumar Hanumolu, Mayank Kulkarni, Mahdi Namazifar, Bin Hu 0002 |
NeurIPS | 11 |