Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Harald Eskelund Franck

dblp:418/0986 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Learning theory · 87% Trustworthy machine learning · 13%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
mistake bounds
1.012026
Learning in an Echo Chamber: Online Learning with Replay Adversary · SODA 2026
Machine learning › Learning theory
online learning
1.012026
Learning in an Echo Chamber: Online Learning with Replay Adversary · SODA 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

learning-theoretic analysis · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Learning in an Echo Chamber: Online Learning with Replay Adversary
abstract
As machine learning systems increasingly train on self-annotated data, they risk reinforcing errors and becoming echo chambers of their own beliefs. We model this phenomenon by introducing a learning-theoretic framework: Online Learning in the Replay Setting. In round \(t\), the learner outputs a hypothesis \(\hat{h}_t\); the adversary then reveals either the true label \(f^{*}(x_t)\) or a replayed label \(\hat{h}_i(x_t)\) from an earlier round \(i \lt t\). A mistake is counted only when the true label is shown, yet classical algorithms such as the SOA or the halving algorithm are easily misled by the replayed errors.
Daniil Dmitriev, Harald Eskelund Franck, Carolin Heinzler, Amartya Sanyal
SODA2