Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Chanyong Kim

dblp:418/2102 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0008-1763-8752ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 75% Graph learning · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network
0.912025
Harnessing Influence Function in Explaining Graph Neural Networks · KDD (2) 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
graph neural network explanation
0.912025
Harnessing Influence Function in Explaining Graph Neural Networks · KDD (2) 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › training data attribution
influence function
0.912025
Harnessing Influence Function in Explaining Graph Neural Networks · KDD (2) 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.912025
Harnessing Influence Function in Explaining Graph Neural Networks · KDD (2) 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

influence functions · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Harnessing Influence Function in Explaining Graph Neural Networks
abstract
Explaining graphs and their target Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) has gained attention with the growing use of GNNs. Most existing explainable AI (XAI) methods for GNNs focus on extracting an explanation subgraph and assume the target GNN is supervised with accessible class probabilities. However, the growing prevalence of GNN models in unsupervised settings underscores the necessity for task-irrelevant explanations. Moreover, most existing studies scarcely explore whether identifying edges absent from the original graph can improve explanation quality. To this end, we propose HINT-G (Harnessing INfluence function for Task-irrelevant explanation on Graph neural networks), a method that uses influence functions to explain models across diverse learning paradigms and considers edges beyond the given graph. The influence of an edge can be determined directly or by aggregating the influence scores of its constituent nodes, while the influence of a non-existent edge can also be determined. Furthermore, this method is task-irrelevant, since the influence score can be obtained whenever the loss function of the target model is differentiable. Experimental results on several datasets consistently demonstrate that HINT-G effectively explains graphs through the influence function framework. Our implementation code is available at https://github.com/cycy-kim/HINT-G.
Heesoo Jung, Chanyong Kim, Geonhee Han, Hogun Park
KDD (2)2