Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Komal Kumar Teru
dblp:418/2149
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 56% Language models and text generation · 44% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model training |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Tracing the Representation Geometry of Language Models from Pretraining to Post-training · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation analysis
learned representation analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Tracing the Representation Geometry of Language Models from Pretraining to Post-training · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
representation geometry |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Tracing the Representation Geometry of Language Models from Pretraining to Post-training · NeurIPS 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
instruction tuning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Tracing the Representation Geometry of Language Models from Pretraining to Post-training · NeurIPS 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model training
post-training |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Tracing the Representation Geometry of Language Models from Pretraining to Post-training · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
spectral analysis · 0.9eigenspectrum decay · 0.9effective rank · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Tracing the Representation Geometry of Language Models from Pretraining to Post-trainingabstractStandard training metrics like loss fail to explain the emergence of complex capabilities in large language models. We take a spectral approach to investigate the geometry of learned representations across pretraining and post-training, measuring effective rank (RankMe) and eigenspectrum decay (αReQ). With OLMo (1B-7B) and Pythia (160M-12B) models, we uncover a consistent non-monotonic
sequence of three geometric phases during autoregressive pretraining. The initial “warmup” phase exhibits rapid representational collapse. This is followed by an “entropy-seeking” phase, where the manifold’s dimensionality expands substantially, coinciding with peak n-gram memorization. Subsequently, a “compression-seeking” phase imposes anisotropic consolidation, selectively preserving variance along dominant eigendirections while contracting others, a transition marked with significant improvement in downstream task performance. We show these phases can emerge from a fundamental interplay of cross-entropy optimization under skewed token frequencies and representational bottlenecks (d ≪ |V|). Post-training further transforms geometry: SFT and DPO drive “entropy-seeking” dynamics to integrate specific instructional or preferential data, improving in-distribution performance while degrading out-of-distribution robustness. Conversely, RLVR induces “compression-seeking” , enhancing reward alignment but reducing generation diversity. Melody Zixuan Li, Kumar Krishna Agrawal, Arna Ghosh, Komal Kumar Teru, Adam Santoro, Guillaume Lajoie, Blake A. Richards |
NeurIPS | 4 |