Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tianke Ban

dblp:419/7089 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 30% Reinforcement learning · 30% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 30%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
iterative inference
0.912025
Unilaw-R1: A Large Language Model for Legal Reasoning with Reinforcement Learning and Iterative Inference · EMNLP 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › normative reasoning
legal reasoning
0.912025
Unilaw-R1: A Large Language Model for Legal Reasoning with Reinforcement Learning and Iterative Inference · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reinforcement learning from human feedback
0.912025
Unilaw-R1: A Large Language Model for Legal Reasoning with Reinforcement Learning and Iterative Inference · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
chain-of-thought reasoning
0.312025
Unilaw-R1: A Large Language Model for Legal Reasoning with Reinforcement Learning and Iterative Inference · EMNLP 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

supervised fine-tuning · 0.9reinforcement learning · 0.9knowledge distillation · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Unilaw-R1: A Large Language Model for Legal Reasoning with Reinforcement Learning and Iterative Inference
abstract
Reasoning-focused large language models (LLMs) are rapidly evolving across various domains, yet their capabilities in handling complex legal problems remains underexplored.In this paper, we introduce Unilaw-R1, a large language model tailored for legal reasoning.With a lightweight 7-billion parameter scale, Unilaw-R1 significantly reduces deployment cost while effectively tackling three core challenges in the legal domain: insufficient legal knowledge, unreliable reasoning logic, and weak business generalization.To address these issues, we first construct Unilaw-R1-Data, a high-quality dataset containing ∼17K distilled and screened chain-of-thought (CoT) samples.Based on this, we adopt a two-stage training strategy combining Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and Reinforcement Learning (RL), which significantly boosts the model's performance on complex legal reasoning tasks and supports interpretable decision-making in legal AI applications.To assess legal reasoning ability, we also introduce Unilaw-R1-Eval, a dedicated benchmark designed to evaluate models across single-and multi-choice legal tasks.Unilaw-R1 demonstrates strong results on authoritative benchmarks, outperforming all models of similar scale and achieving performance on par with the much larger DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B (54.9%).Following domainspecific training, it also showed significant gains on LawBench and LexEval, exceeding Qwen-2.5-7B-Instruct(46.6%) by an average margin of 6.6%.Code is available at: https://github.com/Hanscal/Unilaw-R1.
Hua Cai, Xuli Shen, Qing Xu 0017, Weilin Shen, Tianke Ban
EMNLP8