Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tim Rieder
dblp:419/7250
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 70% Algorithms and data structures · 30% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph algorithms |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Random-Shift Revisited: Tight Approximations for Tree Embeddings and ℓ₁-Oblivious Routings · FOCS 2025 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph algorithms › routing
oblivious routing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Random-Shift Revisited: Tight Approximations for Tree Embeddings and ℓ₁-Oblivious Routings · FOCS 2025 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph algorithms
routing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Random-Shift Revisited: Tight Approximations for Tree Embeddings and ℓ₁-Oblivious Routings · FOCS 2025 |
Algorithms and data structures › metric embedding
tree embedding |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Random-Shift Revisited: Tight Approximations for Tree Embeddings and ℓ₁-Oblivious Routings · FOCS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
random-shift decomposition · 0.9metric embedding · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Random-Shift Revisited: Tight Approximations for Tree Embeddings and ℓ₁-Oblivious RoutingsabstractWe present a new and surprisingly simple analysis of random-shift decompositions-originally proposed by Miller, Peng, and Xu [SPAA’13]: We show that decompositions for exponentially growing scales $D=2^{0}, 2^{1}, \ldots, 2^{\log _{2}(\operatorname{diam}(G))}$, have a tight constant trade-off between distance-to-center and separation probability on average across the distance scales - opposed to a necessary $\Omega(\log n)$ trade-off for a single scale. This almost immediately yields a way to compute a tree T for graph G that preserves all graph distances with expected $O(\log n)$-stretch. This gives an alternative proof that obtains tight approximation bounds of the seminal result by Fakcharoenphol, Rao, and Talwar [STOC’03] matching the $\Omega(\log n)$ lower bound by Bartal [FOCS’96]. Our insights can also be used to refine the analysis of a simple $\ell_{1}$-oblivious routing proposed in [FOCS’22], yielding a tight $O(\log n)$ competitive ratio. Our algorithms for constructing tree embeddings and $\ell_{1}$ oblivious routings can be implemented in the sequential, parallel, and distributed settings with optimal work, depth, and rounds, up to polylogarithmic factors. Previously, fast algorithms with tight guarantees were not known for tree embeddings in parallel and distributed settings, and for $\ell_{1}$-oblivious routings, not even a fast sequential algorithm was known. Rasmus Kyng, Maximilian Probst Gutenberg, Tim Rieder |
FOCS | 3 |