Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tim Rieder

dblp:419/7250 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 70% Algorithms and data structures · 30%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph algorithms
0.912025
Random-Shift Revisited: Tight Approximations for Tree Embeddings and ℓ₁-Oblivious Routings · FOCS 2025
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph algorithms › routing
oblivious routing
0.912025
Random-Shift Revisited: Tight Approximations for Tree Embeddings and ℓ₁-Oblivious Routings · FOCS 2025
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph algorithms
routing
0.912025
Random-Shift Revisited: Tight Approximations for Tree Embeddings and ℓ₁-Oblivious Routings · FOCS 2025
Algorithms and data structures › metric embedding
tree embedding
0.912025
Random-Shift Revisited: Tight Approximations for Tree Embeddings and ℓ₁-Oblivious Routings · FOCS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

random-shift decomposition · 0.9metric embedding · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Random-Shift Revisited: Tight Approximations for Tree Embeddings and ℓ₁-Oblivious Routings
abstract
We present a new and surprisingly simple analysis of random-shift decompositions-originally proposed by Miller, Peng, and Xu [SPAA’13]: We show that decompositions for exponentially growing scales $D=2^{0}, 2^{1}, \ldots, 2^{\log _{2}(\operatorname{diam}(G))}$, have a tight constant trade-off between distance-to-center and separation probability on average across the distance scales - opposed to a necessary $\Omega(\log n)$ trade-off for a single scale. This almost immediately yields a way to compute a tree T for graph G that preserves all graph distances with expected $O(\log n)$-stretch. This gives an alternative proof that obtains tight approximation bounds of the seminal result by Fakcharoenphol, Rao, and Talwar [STOC’03] matching the $\Omega(\log n)$ lower bound by Bartal [FOCS’96]. Our insights can also be used to refine the analysis of a simple $\ell_{1}$-oblivious routing proposed in [FOCS’22], yielding a tight $O(\log n)$ competitive ratio. Our algorithms for constructing tree embeddings and $\ell_{1}$ oblivious routings can be implemented in the sequential, parallel, and distributed settings with optimal work, depth, and rounds, up to polylogarithmic factors. Previously, fast algorithms with tight guarantees were not known for tree embeddings in parallel and distributed settings, and for $\ell_{1}$-oblivious routings, not even a fast sequential algorithm was known.
Rasmus Kyng, Maximilian Probst Gutenberg, Tim Rieder
FOCS3