Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tingjuntao Ni

dblp:419/8594 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation
0.912025
SocioBench: Modeling Human Behavior in Sociological Surveys with Large Language Models · EMNLP 2025
Computational social science and digital humanities
social simulation
0.912025
SocioBench: Modeling Human Behavior in Sociological Surveys with Large Language Models · EMNLP 2025
Computational social science and digital humanities
survey simulation
0.912025
SocioBench: Modeling Human Behavior in Sociological Surveys with Large Language Models · EMNLP 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large language model simulation · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 SocioBench: Modeling Human Behavior in Sociological Surveys with Large Language Models
abstract
Large language models (LLMs) show strong potential for simulating human social behaviors and interactions, yet lack large-scale, systematically constructed benchmarks for evaluating their alignment with real-world social attitudes.To bridge this gap, we introduce SocioBench-a comprehensive benchmark derived from the annually collected, standardized survey data of the International Social Survey Programme (ISSP).The benchmark aggregates over 480,000 real respondent records from more than 30 countries, spanning 10 sociological domains and over 40 demographic attributes.Our experiments indicate that LLMs achieve only 30-40% accuracy when simulating individuals in complex survey scenarios, with statistically significant differences across domains and demographic subgroups.These findings highlight several limitations of current LLMs in survey scenarios, including insufficient individuallevel data coverage, inadequate scenario diversity, and missing group-level modeling.We have open-sourced SocioBench at https:// github.com/JiaWANG-TJ/SocioBench.
Jia Wang 0058, Tingjuntao Ni, Zhongyu Wei
EMNLP3