Communication networks are essential for our economy and our everyday lives. This makes them lucrative targets for attacks. Today, we see an ongoing battle between criminals that try to disrupt our key communication networks and security professionals that try to mitigate these attacks. However, today's networks, like the Internet or peer-to-peer networks among smart devices, are not controlled by a single authority, but instead consist of many independently administrated entities that are interconnected. Thus, both the decisions of how to interconnect and how to secure against potential attacks are taken in a decentralized way by selfish agents. This strategic setting, with agents that want to interconnect and potential attackers that want to disrupt the network, was captured via an influential game-theoretic model by Goyal, Jabbari, Kearns, Khanna, and Morgenstern (WINE 2016). We revisit this model and show improved tight bounds on the achieved robustness of networks created by selfish agents. As our main result, we show that such networks can resist attacks of a large class of potential attackers, i.e., these networks maintain asymptotically optimal welfare post attack. This improves several bounds and resolves an open problem. Along the way, we show the counter-intuitive result, that attackers that aim at minimizing the social welfare post attack do not actually inflict the greatest possible damage.

The Dominating \(H\)-Pattern problem generalizes the classical \(k\)-Dominating Set problem: for a fixed pattern \(H\) and a given graph \(G\), the goal is to find an induced subgraph \(S\) of \(G\) such that (1) \(S\) is isomorphic to \(H\), and (2) \(S\) forms a dominating set in \(G\). Fine-grained complexity results show that on worstcase inputs, any significant improvement over the naive brute-force algorithm is unlikely, as this would refute the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis. Nevertheless, a recent work by Dransfeld et al. (ESA 2025) reveals some significant improvement potential particularly in sparse graphs.